A Retrospective analysis of biosimilar and reference trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive early and/or locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting: Safety and event-free survival outcomes

Rahul Kulkarni, S. Kulkarni, A. Pathan, S. Nag
{"title":"A Retrospective analysis of biosimilar and reference trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive early and/or locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting: Safety and event-free survival outcomes","authors":"Rahul Kulkarni, S. Kulkarni, A. Pathan, S. Nag","doi":"10.4103/oji.oji_25_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is limited real-world evidence on the treatment outcomes with Trastuzumab, specifically with biosimilars. This analysis aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Trastuzumab in early and/or locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant treatment in the real world setting and to compare biosimilar with reference trastuzumab. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-positive breast cancers, who were treated with trastuzumab-based standard therapies. The survival curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated. All patients were assessed for toxicity as per CTCAE version 4.0. The subgroup analysis was carried out to compare the effectiveness of biosimilar with reference trastuzumab. Results: A total of 88 patients were evaluated from 2008 to 2018. EFS at 1, 2, and 5-year was 89.5%, 78%, and 44.2%, respectively. The median EFS was 43 months. In subgroup analysis, the 1, 2-, and 3-year EFS rates were 86.7%, 86.7%, and 57.8%, respectively, for reference Trastuzumab (n = 29) as compared to 91%, 74.4%, and 56.9%, respectively, for Biosimilar Trastuzumab (n = 59). Similarly, median EFS was 43 months and not reached, respectively. There was no significant difference in EFS between the two groups (P = 0.991). A significant asymptomatic decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥10% to below the lower limit of normal was noted in only two patients (2.3%). There was no significant difference observed in reduction of LVEF to below the lower limit of normal between the two groups (P = 0.514). The common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) observed such as vomiting, diarrhea, pancytopenia, and anemia were mostly due to chemotherapy. These AEs were comparable in both groups. Conclusions: The EFS in our study is consistent with the historical data. Safety and effectiveness of biosimilars were comparable to the reference transtuzumab.","PeriodicalId":431823,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Journal of India","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/oji.oji_25_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited real-world evidence on the treatment outcomes with Trastuzumab, specifically with biosimilars. This analysis aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Trastuzumab in early and/or locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant treatment in the real world setting and to compare biosimilar with reference trastuzumab. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-positive breast cancers, who were treated with trastuzumab-based standard therapies. The survival curves were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated. All patients were assessed for toxicity as per CTCAE version 4.0. The subgroup analysis was carried out to compare the effectiveness of biosimilar with reference trastuzumab. Results: A total of 88 patients were evaluated from 2008 to 2018. EFS at 1, 2, and 5-year was 89.5%, 78%, and 44.2%, respectively. The median EFS was 43 months. In subgroup analysis, the 1, 2-, and 3-year EFS rates were 86.7%, 86.7%, and 57.8%, respectively, for reference Trastuzumab (n = 29) as compared to 91%, 74.4%, and 56.9%, respectively, for Biosimilar Trastuzumab (n = 59). Similarly, median EFS was 43 months and not reached, respectively. There was no significant difference in EFS between the two groups (P = 0.991). A significant asymptomatic decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥10% to below the lower limit of normal was noted in only two patients (2.3%). There was no significant difference observed in reduction of LVEF to below the lower limit of normal between the two groups (P = 0.514). The common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) observed such as vomiting, diarrhea, pancytopenia, and anemia were mostly due to chemotherapy. These AEs were comparable in both groups. Conclusions: The EFS in our study is consistent with the historical data. Safety and effectiveness of biosimilars were comparable to the reference transtuzumab.
生物仿制药和参考曲妥珠单抗在人表皮生长因子受体-2阳性早期和/或局部晚期乳腺癌患者中应用新佐剂辅助治疗的回顾性分析:安全性和无事件生存结果
背景:关于曲妥珠单抗治疗结果的真实证据有限,特别是生物仿制药。该分析旨在评估曲妥珠单抗在早期和/或局部晚期乳腺癌患者中接受新辅助辅助治疗的安全性和有效性,并将生物仿制药与参考曲妥珠单抗进行比较。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了接受基于曲妥珠单抗的标准治疗的人表皮生长因子受体-2 (HER-2)阳性乳腺癌患者的数据。生存曲线采用Kaplan-Meier法生成。计算无事件生存期(EFS)。所有患者均按照CTCAE 4.0版进行毒性评估。进行亚组分析以比较生物仿制药与参考曲妥珠单抗的有效性。结果:2008 - 2018年共评估88例患者。1、2和5年的EFS分别为89.5%、78%和44.2%。中位EFS为43个月。在亚组分析中,参考曲妥珠单抗(n = 29)的1年、2年和3年EFS发生率分别为86.7%、86.7%和57.8%,而生物类似药曲妥珠单抗(n = 59)的EFS发生率分别为91%、74.4%和56.9%。同样,中位EFS分别为43个月和未达到。两组患者EFS评分差异无统计学意义(P = 0.991)。左心室射血分数(LVEF)显著无症状下降≥10%至低于正常值下限的仅有2例(2.3%)。两组患者LVEF降至正常下限以下差异无统计学意义(P = 0.514)。常见的3/4级不良事件(ae)如呕吐、腹泻、全血细胞减少、贫血等主要由化疗引起。两组的ae具有可比性。结论:本研究的EFS与历史数据一致。生物仿制药的安全性和有效性与参考药物曲妥珠单抗相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信