Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells

Michael Mendez, R. Ahmed, H. Karami, Mustafa Nasser, I. Hussein, S. Garcia, Andres Gonzalez
{"title":"Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells","authors":"Michael Mendez, R. Ahmed, H. Karami, Mustafa Nasser, I. Hussein, S. Garcia, Andres Gonzalez","doi":"10.2118/212912-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Machine learning (ML) has become a robust method for modeling field operations based on measurements. For example, wellbore cleanout is a critical operation that needs to be optimized to enhance the removal of solids to reduce problems associated with poor hole cleaning. However, as wellbore geometry becomes more complicated, it gets more difficult to predict the cleaning performance of fluids. As a result, optimization is often challenging. Therefore, this study aims to develop a data-driven model for predicting hole cleaning in deviated wells to optimize drilling performance.\n More than 500 flow loop measurements from 8 studies are used to formulate a suitable ML model to forecast hole cleanout in directional wells. Measurements were obtained from hole-cleaning experiments that were conducted using different loop configurations. Test sections ranged in length from 22 to 100 feet, in hole diameter from 4 to 8 inches, and in pipe diameter from 2 to 4.5 inches. The experiments provided measured equilibrium bed height at a specific flow rate for various fluids, including water-based and oil-based fluids and fluids containing fibers. Several relevant test parameters, including fluid and cutting properties, well inclination, and drilling string rotation speed, were also considered in the analysis. The collected data has been analyzed using the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM). Six different machine learning techniques (Random Forest, Linear Regression, Neural Networks, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, Support Vector Machine, and Boosted Decision Tree) have been evaluated to select the most appropriate method for predicting bed thickness in a wellbore. Also, we compared the predictions of the selected ML method with those of a mechanistic model for cases without drill string rotation. Finally, using the ML model, a parametric study has been conducted to investigate the impact of various parameters on the cleanout performance of selected fluids.\n Results show the relative influence of different variables on the prediction of cuttings bed. Accordingly, flow rate, drill string rotation, and fluid behavior index have a strong impact on dimensionless bed thickness, while other parameters such as fluid consistency index, solids density and diameter, fiber concentration, and well inclination angle have a moderate effect. The Boosted Decision Tree algorithm has provided the most accurate prediction with an R-square of approximately 90%, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of close to 0.07, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of roughly 0.05. A comparison between a mechanistic model and the selected ML technique shows that the ML model provided better predictions.","PeriodicalId":303929,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, March 22, 2023","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, March 22, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212912-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has become a robust method for modeling field operations based on measurements. For example, wellbore cleanout is a critical operation that needs to be optimized to enhance the removal of solids to reduce problems associated with poor hole cleaning. However, as wellbore geometry becomes more complicated, it gets more difficult to predict the cleaning performance of fluids. As a result, optimization is often challenging. Therefore, this study aims to develop a data-driven model for predicting hole cleaning in deviated wells to optimize drilling performance. More than 500 flow loop measurements from 8 studies are used to formulate a suitable ML model to forecast hole cleanout in directional wells. Measurements were obtained from hole-cleaning experiments that were conducted using different loop configurations. Test sections ranged in length from 22 to 100 feet, in hole diameter from 4 to 8 inches, and in pipe diameter from 2 to 4.5 inches. The experiments provided measured equilibrium bed height at a specific flow rate for various fluids, including water-based and oil-based fluids and fluids containing fibers. Several relevant test parameters, including fluid and cutting properties, well inclination, and drilling string rotation speed, were also considered in the analysis. The collected data has been analyzed using the Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining (CRISP-DM). Six different machine learning techniques (Random Forest, Linear Regression, Neural Networks, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, Support Vector Machine, and Boosted Decision Tree) have been evaluated to select the most appropriate method for predicting bed thickness in a wellbore. Also, we compared the predictions of the selected ML method with those of a mechanistic model for cases without drill string rotation. Finally, using the ML model, a parametric study has been conducted to investigate the impact of various parameters on the cleanout performance of selected fluids. Results show the relative influence of different variables on the prediction of cuttings bed. Accordingly, flow rate, drill string rotation, and fluid behavior index have a strong impact on dimensionless bed thickness, while other parameters such as fluid consistency index, solids density and diameter, fiber concentration, and well inclination angle have a moderate effect. The Boosted Decision Tree algorithm has provided the most accurate prediction with an R-square of approximately 90%, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of close to 0.07, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of roughly 0.05. A comparison between a mechanistic model and the selected ML technique shows that the ML model provided better predictions.
机器学习方法在水平井和大斜度井井眼清洁预测中的应用
机器学习(ML)已经成为基于测量的现场操作建模的一种强大方法。例如,井筒清洗是一项关键的作业,需要对其进行优化,以提高固体的清除能力,减少与井筒清洁不良相关的问题。然而,随着井筒几何形状的日益复杂,预测流体的清洗性能变得越来越困难。因此,优化通常是具有挑战性的。因此,本研究旨在开发一种数据驱动模型,用于预测斜度井的井眼清洁情况,以优化钻井性能。来自8项研究的500多个流动环测量数据用于制定合适的ML模型,以预测定向井的井眼清洗。测量结果来自使用不同回路配置进行的孔清洗实验。测试段长度从22英尺到100英尺不等,井径从4英寸到8英寸不等,管径从2英寸到4.5英寸不等。实验提供了不同流体在特定流速下的平衡床层高度,包括水基、油基流体和含纤维流体。在分析中还考虑了一些相关的测试参数,包括流体和切削性能、井斜和钻柱旋转速度。使用跨行业数据挖掘标准流程(CRISP-DM)对收集的数据进行分析。评估了六种不同的机器学习技术(随机森林、线性回归、神经网络、多元自适应回归样条、支持向量机和增强决策树),以选择最合适的方法来预测井筒层厚。此外,我们还将所选ML方法的预测结果与没有钻柱旋转情况下的机械模型的预测结果进行了比较。最后,利用ML模型进行了参数化研究,研究了各种参数对选定流体清洗性能的影响。结果显示了不同变量对岩屑床预测的相对影响。因此,流量、钻柱旋转和流体行为指标对无量纲层厚的影响较大,而流体稠度指标、固体密度和直径、纤维浓度、井斜倾角等其他参数的影响较小。提升决策树算法提供了最准确的预测,其r平方约为90%,均方根误差(RMSE)接近0.07,平均绝对误差(MAE)约为0.05。机械模型与所选机器学习技术之间的比较表明,机器学习模型提供了更好的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信