Causal analysis: Rational simplicity works

Grigory I. Gusev, Tatiana Peftieva
{"title":"Causal analysis: Rational simplicity works","authors":"Grigory I. Gusev, Tatiana Peftieva","doi":"10.1109/CEE-SECR.2009.5501187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Causal Analysis is a powerful process improvement tool and a required practice in ISO and CMMI. Since wide use of traditionally recommended analysis methods requires much effort, many companies prefer formal analysis implementation for “certification” purpose only, thereby losing a beneficial opportunity. According to Luxoft experience, the two major challenges of the causal analysis are the selection of problems and defects, correction and prevention of which is most effective; and finding root causes underlying those problems as deep as possible. One of the possible solutions to the problems is within the simplest causal analysis methods and determined procedures on the project level combined with complicated quantitative analysis on the organizational level. The results are proved by effective treatment of the root causes, improved process indicators, and wide implementation in practice.","PeriodicalId":402768,"journal":{"name":"2009 5th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference in Russia (CEE-SECR)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 5th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference in Russia (CEE-SECR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEE-SECR.2009.5501187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Causal Analysis is a powerful process improvement tool and a required practice in ISO and CMMI. Since wide use of traditionally recommended analysis methods requires much effort, many companies prefer formal analysis implementation for “certification” purpose only, thereby losing a beneficial opportunity. According to Luxoft experience, the two major challenges of the causal analysis are the selection of problems and defects, correction and prevention of which is most effective; and finding root causes underlying those problems as deep as possible. One of the possible solutions to the problems is within the simplest causal analysis methods and determined procedures on the project level combined with complicated quantitative analysis on the organizational level. The results are proved by effective treatment of the root causes, improved process indicators, and wide implementation in practice.
原因分析:理性的简单有效
原因分析是一种强大的过程改进工具,也是ISO和CMMI要求的实践。由于广泛使用传统推荐的分析方法需要付出很多努力,因此许多公司更倾向于仅为“认证”目的而实现正式的分析,从而失去了一个有益的机会。根据Luxoft的经验,因果分析的两大挑战是选择问题和缺陷,纠正和预防其中最有效;尽可能深入地找出这些问题背后的根本原因。其中一个可能的解决方案是在最简单的原因分析方法和确定的程序在项目层面结合复杂的定量分析在组织层面。通过对根本原因的有效处理、工艺指标的改进以及在实践中的广泛实施,取得了良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信