Comparative Study of Two Localization Approaches for Mobile Robots in an Indoor Environment

J. Robotics Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.1155/2022/1999082
Eman Alhamdi, R. Hedjar
{"title":"Comparative Study of Two Localization Approaches for Mobile Robots in an Indoor Environment","authors":"Eman Alhamdi, R. Hedjar","doi":"10.1155/2022/1999082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last years, mobile robot localization has been developed significantly due to the need for accurate solutions to determine the position and orientation of the wheeled mobile robot (WMR) in a given environment. Many different sensors have been used to solve the problem. For instance, ultrasonic sensors, laser, or infrared sensors are also used to determine the pose of the WMR. However, sensors are sensitive to noise measurements and disturbances, which can distort the acquired information. For this reason, adequate algorithms should be used to reduce these uncertainties and determine the optimal pose of the WMR. In this research work, we focus on the comparative study of the most used algorithms, using landmarks as sensors, which are the extended Kalman filter and particle filter. Further, for an effective comparison, the simulation results were conducted and analyzed using different performance criteria. The simulations results showed better estimation performance achieved by the particle filter being compared to the extended Kalman filter when the sensors are subject to non-Gaussian noises.","PeriodicalId":186435,"journal":{"name":"J. Robotics","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1999082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last years, mobile robot localization has been developed significantly due to the need for accurate solutions to determine the position and orientation of the wheeled mobile robot (WMR) in a given environment. Many different sensors have been used to solve the problem. For instance, ultrasonic sensors, laser, or infrared sensors are also used to determine the pose of the WMR. However, sensors are sensitive to noise measurements and disturbances, which can distort the acquired information. For this reason, adequate algorithms should be used to reduce these uncertainties and determine the optimal pose of the WMR. In this research work, we focus on the comparative study of the most used algorithms, using landmarks as sensors, which are the extended Kalman filter and particle filter. Further, for an effective comparison, the simulation results were conducted and analyzed using different performance criteria. The simulations results showed better estimation performance achieved by the particle filter being compared to the extended Kalman filter when the sensors are subject to non-Gaussian noises.
室内环境下移动机器人两种定位方法的比较研究
在过去的几年里,由于需要精确的解决方案来确定轮式移动机器人(WMR)在给定环境中的位置和方向,移动机器人定位已经得到了显著的发展。许多不同的传感器被用来解决这个问题。例如,超声波传感器、激光或红外传感器也用于确定WMR的姿态。然而,传感器对噪声测量和干扰很敏感,这可能会扭曲获取的信息。因此,应该使用适当的算法来减少这些不确定性并确定WMR的最佳位姿。在本研究工作中,我们重点比较了以地标为传感器的常用算法,即扩展卡尔曼滤波和粒子滤波。此外,为了进行有效的比较,采用不同的性能标准对仿真结果进行了分析。仿真结果表明,当传感器存在非高斯噪声时,粒子滤波比扩展卡尔曼滤波具有更好的估计性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信