{"title":"A structured review of IS research on gender and IT","authors":"Michael J. Gallivan","doi":"10.1145/2487294.2487304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite many contributions to research on gender and IT ? both empirical and conceptual ? the IS field lacks an overall review of this stream of research. We provide such a review of IS research on gender and IT spanning 20 years, following the guidelines for conducting a ?descriptive review? (King and He 2006). Focusing on IS journals and conferences, we identify over 190 papers in which the authors specifically mentioned one or more of a set of terms in their title, appendix or keywords (e.g., gender, sex, men, women, etc.). We identify the recurring authors in this research stream and we classify these authors? research methods, types of respondents studied, authors? epistemological stance and their gender theory-in-use. We identify four topic areas and, for each, we provide descriptive summaries of corresponding papers: IT ethics; IT careers and education; IT adoption and use; attitudes to telework. Many papers we located neglect to specify a clear theory-in-use regarding gender (i.e., whether the authors believe that observed differences between men and women are socially constructed, due to biological factors, or the result of other influences). We found few studies that regard men, who account for a majority of IT employees, as gendered or consider gender a relevant issue when studying male employees, teleworkers, or computer users. Authors of most papers seem to assume that the presence of women is necessary to trigger gender as an issue.","PeriodicalId":149561,"journal":{"name":"SIGMIS-CPR '13","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMIS-CPR '13","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2487294.2487304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Despite many contributions to research on gender and IT ? both empirical and conceptual ? the IS field lacks an overall review of this stream of research. We provide such a review of IS research on gender and IT spanning 20 years, following the guidelines for conducting a ?descriptive review? (King and He 2006). Focusing on IS journals and conferences, we identify over 190 papers in which the authors specifically mentioned one or more of a set of terms in their title, appendix or keywords (e.g., gender, sex, men, women, etc.). We identify the recurring authors in this research stream and we classify these authors? research methods, types of respondents studied, authors? epistemological stance and their gender theory-in-use. We identify four topic areas and, for each, we provide descriptive summaries of corresponding papers: IT ethics; IT careers and education; IT adoption and use; attitudes to telework. Many papers we located neglect to specify a clear theory-in-use regarding gender (i.e., whether the authors believe that observed differences between men and women are socially constructed, due to biological factors, or the result of other influences). We found few studies that regard men, who account for a majority of IT employees, as gendered or consider gender a relevant issue when studying male employees, teleworkers, or computer users. Authors of most papers seem to assume that the presence of women is necessary to trigger gender as an issue.
尽管对性别和IT的研究做出了许多贡献?无论是经验的还是概念的?信息系统领域缺乏对这一研究流的全面回顾。我们遵循“描述性回顾”的指导方针,对20年来关于性别和信息技术的信息系统研究进行了回顾。(King and He, 2006)。关注IS期刊和会议,我们确定了超过190篇论文,其中作者在其标题,附录或关键词中特别提到了一组或多个术语(例如,性别,性别,男性,女性等)。我们找出这个研究流中反复出现的作者并对这些作者进行分类?研究方法,调查对象类型,作者?认识论立场及其性别理论的运用。我们确定了四个主题领域,并为每个领域提供了相应论文的描述性摘要:IT伦理;资讯科技职业及教育;采用及使用资讯科技;对远程办公的态度。我们找到的许多论文都忽略了明确的关于性别的使用理论(即,作者是否认为观察到的男女之间的差异是社会建构的,是由于生物因素,还是其他影响的结果)。我们发现很少有研究将占IT员工大多数的男性视为性别,或者在研究男性员工、远程工作者或计算机用户时将性别视为相关问题。大多数论文的作者似乎都认为,女性的存在是触发性别问题的必要条件。