Analysis of Santri's critical thinking with Problem Solving approach

Y. Trisanti, H. Saleh, Fetty Nuritasari
{"title":"Analysis of Santri's critical thinking with Problem Solving approach","authors":"Y. Trisanti, H. Saleh, Fetty Nuritasari","doi":"10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the students' thinking ability in solving mathematical problems with Islamic nuances on the subject of the 7th grade set of MTs Darul Ulum Banyuanyar. Before conducting the research, the subject was given learning or knowledge about mathematics with Islamic nuances, more specifically the set material. The technique of taking research subjects is done by using purposive sampling technique. The selected subjects were 3 respondents. In checking the validity of the research using triangulation, the triangulation used is time triangulation. The results of this study indicate that high-ability students can pass all indicators in the indicators of critical thinking, creative and inductive reasoning. Meanwhile, for students with moderate abilities (second and third subjects) in critical thinking, the two subjects go through elementary clarification indicators, not through basic support indicators and determine strategies and tactic. Indicators for drawing conclusions (inference) and further clarification (advances clarification) can be passed, but in the work carried out, it is not done correctly. In creative thinking, students with moderate ability are both through the indicators of fluency and flexibility, and not through indicators of originality and elaboration. Whereas in inductive reasoning the second subject only met two of the 3 indicators of inductive reasoning, namely, fulfilling the indicators of identifying mathematical processes/concepts and their tendencies from the given situation, and compiling estimates relevant to the statement. Meanwhile, in inductive reasoning, the third subject only fulfills one indicator, namely identifying mathematical processes/concepts and their tendencies from the given situation.","PeriodicalId":280543,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i3.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe the students' thinking ability in solving mathematical problems with Islamic nuances on the subject of the 7th grade set of MTs Darul Ulum Banyuanyar. Before conducting the research, the subject was given learning or knowledge about mathematics with Islamic nuances, more specifically the set material. The technique of taking research subjects is done by using purposive sampling technique. The selected subjects were 3 respondents. In checking the validity of the research using triangulation, the triangulation used is time triangulation. The results of this study indicate that high-ability students can pass all indicators in the indicators of critical thinking, creative and inductive reasoning. Meanwhile, for students with moderate abilities (second and third subjects) in critical thinking, the two subjects go through elementary clarification indicators, not through basic support indicators and determine strategies and tactic. Indicators for drawing conclusions (inference) and further clarification (advances clarification) can be passed, but in the work carried out, it is not done correctly. In creative thinking, students with moderate ability are both through the indicators of fluency and flexibility, and not through indicators of originality and elaboration. Whereas in inductive reasoning the second subject only met two of the 3 indicators of inductive reasoning, namely, fulfilling the indicators of identifying mathematical processes/concepts and their tendencies from the given situation, and compiling estimates relevant to the statement. Meanwhile, in inductive reasoning, the third subject only fulfills one indicator, namely identifying mathematical processes/concepts and their tendencies from the given situation.
用问题解决方法分析桑特里的批判性思维
本研究旨在描述学生在七年级《达鲁乌姆班元雅》科目中解决伊斯兰教细微差别数学问题的思维能力。在进行研究之前,研究对象被赋予了伊斯兰教细微差别的数学知识,更具体地说,是固定的材料。选取研究对象的方法是采用有目的抽样技术。被选对象为3名受访者。在检验三角测量研究的有效性时,使用的三角测量是时间三角测量。本研究结果表明,高能力学生在批判性思维、创造性思维和归纳推理三个指标中均能通过。同时,对于批判性思维能力中等的学生(第二和第三科目),两个科目通过初级澄清指标,而不是通过基本支持指标来确定策略和战术。得出结论(推断)和进一步澄清(提前澄清)的指标可以通过,但在开展的工作中做得不正确。在创造性思维中,能力中等的学生既通过流畅性和灵活性指标,又不通过独创性和精细化指标。而在归纳推理中,第二个主体只满足归纳推理3个指标中的2个,即完成从给定情况中识别数学过程/概念及其趋势的指标,以及编制与陈述相关的估计。同时,在归纳推理中,第三主体只完成一个指标,即从给定的情况中识别数学过程/概念及其趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信