Evaluating source code summarization techniques: Replication and expansion

Brian P. Eddy, Jeffrey A. Robinson, Nicholas A. Kraft, Jeffrey C. Carver
{"title":"Evaluating source code summarization techniques: Replication and expansion","authors":"Brian P. Eddy, Jeffrey A. Robinson, Nicholas A. Kraft, Jeffrey C. Carver","doi":"10.1109/ICPC.2013.6613829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During software evolution a developer must investigate source code to locate then understand the entities that must be modified to complete a change task. To help developers in this task, Haiduc et al. proposed text summarization based approaches to the automatic generation of class and method summaries, and via a study of four developers, they evaluated source code summaries generated using their techniques. In this paper we propose a new topic modeling based approach to source code summarization, and via a study of 14 developers, we evaluate source code summaries generated using the proposed technique. Our study partially replicates the original study by Haiduc et al. in that it uses the objects, the instruments, and a subset of the summaries from the original study, but it also expands the original study in that it includes more subjects and new summaries. The results of our study both support the findings of the original and provide new insights into the processes and criteria that developers use to evaluate source code summaries. Based on our results, we suggest future directions for research on source code summarization.","PeriodicalId":237170,"journal":{"name":"2013 21st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"121","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 21st International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2013.6613829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 121

Abstract

During software evolution a developer must investigate source code to locate then understand the entities that must be modified to complete a change task. To help developers in this task, Haiduc et al. proposed text summarization based approaches to the automatic generation of class and method summaries, and via a study of four developers, they evaluated source code summaries generated using their techniques. In this paper we propose a new topic modeling based approach to source code summarization, and via a study of 14 developers, we evaluate source code summaries generated using the proposed technique. Our study partially replicates the original study by Haiduc et al. in that it uses the objects, the instruments, and a subset of the summaries from the original study, but it also expands the original study in that it includes more subjects and new summaries. The results of our study both support the findings of the original and provide new insights into the processes and criteria that developers use to evaluate source code summaries. Based on our results, we suggest future directions for research on source code summarization.
评估源代码摘要技术:复制和扩展
在软件开发过程中,开发人员必须研究源代码,以确定并理解必须修改的实体,以完成变更任务。为了帮助开发人员完成这项任务,Haiduc等人提出了基于文本摘要的方法来自动生成类和方法摘要,并且通过对四位开发人员的研究,他们评估了使用他们的技术生成的源代码摘要。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的基于主题建模的源代码摘要方法,并通过对14名开发人员的研究,我们评估了使用该技术生成的源代码摘要。我们的研究部分复制了Haiduc等人的原始研究,因为它使用了原始研究的对象、工具和摘要的子集,但我们也扩展了原始研究,因为它包括了更多的研究对象和新的摘要。我们的研究结果既支持了最初的发现,又为开发人员用来评估源代码摘要的过程和标准提供了新的见解。基于我们的研究结果,我们提出了源代码摘要的未来研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信