Translations of Kepler’s Astrological Writings Part I. Kepler as Practising Astrologer Section 3. Historical Charts Subsection 1. The Nativities of Mohammed and Martin Luther, 1604

{"title":"Translations of Kepler’s Astrological Writings Part I. Kepler as Practising Astrologer Section 3. Historical Charts Subsection 1. The Nativities of Mohammed and Martin Luther, 1604","authors":"","doi":"10.46472/cc.01214.0221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This excerpt is taken from a longer discourse on a commentary by Johann Paul Sutorius (ca. 1562-1599), a pastor, theologian and astrologer, on the nativity of Mohammed, among other things. Kepler begins with a discussion of the birthchart for Mohammed proposed by Sutorius. Helisaeus Röslin, the doctor who had first interpreted Kepler’s own chart, wrote a commentary on Sutorius’s proposed chart, in which he corrected Sutorius’s ‘astronomical errors’ and correctly recalculated the chart for the date and time given by Sutorius: 23 April 594 at 10 a.m. Kepler acknowledges that Roslin’s calculations are correct, but is skeptical of the date itself (one reason being that it would make Mohammed far too young to have done what he did by 622, when he made the flight from Mecca – the Hejira – with his followers; he also wonders where Sutorius got the date in the first place). Kepler mentions other proposed dates for Mohammed: 569 A.D. (from Mercator); 21 September 571 (from a Chronicle of the Koran, which Kepler accepts later in the excerpt); and 23 April 596 (from ‘others’, not specified).2 Though Kepler gives the positions of his own proposed chart for Mohammed in this excerpt, a drawing of it has not survived. Extant is a square form of the chart for the date Sutorius proposed. After discussing Roslin’s and Sutorius’s attempts, Kepler moves on to his own thoughts about Mohammed’s nativity.","PeriodicalId":152044,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Cosmos","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Cosmos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46472/cc.01214.0221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This excerpt is taken from a longer discourse on a commentary by Johann Paul Sutorius (ca. 1562-1599), a pastor, theologian and astrologer, on the nativity of Mohammed, among other things. Kepler begins with a discussion of the birthchart for Mohammed proposed by Sutorius. Helisaeus Röslin, the doctor who had first interpreted Kepler’s own chart, wrote a commentary on Sutorius’s proposed chart, in which he corrected Sutorius’s ‘astronomical errors’ and correctly recalculated the chart for the date and time given by Sutorius: 23 April 594 at 10 a.m. Kepler acknowledges that Roslin’s calculations are correct, but is skeptical of the date itself (one reason being that it would make Mohammed far too young to have done what he did by 622, when he made the flight from Mecca – the Hejira – with his followers; he also wonders where Sutorius got the date in the first place). Kepler mentions other proposed dates for Mohammed: 569 A.D. (from Mercator); 21 September 571 (from a Chronicle of the Koran, which Kepler accepts later in the excerpt); and 23 April 596 (from ‘others’, not specified).2 Though Kepler gives the positions of his own proposed chart for Mohammed in this excerpt, a drawing of it has not survived. Extant is a square form of the chart for the date Sutorius proposed. After discussing Roslin’s and Sutorius’s attempts, Kepler moves on to his own thoughts about Mohammed’s nativity.
开普勒占星著作的翻译(一)作为职业占星家的开普勒历史图表穆罕默德和马丁·路德的诞生(1604年
这一节选自牧师、神学家和占星家约翰·保罗·苏托里乌斯(约1562-1599年)关于穆罕默德诞生的一篇较长的评论。开普勒首先讨论了苏托里乌斯提出的穆罕默德的出生图。赫利塞乌Röslin医生是第一个解释开普勒自己的星图的人,他为苏托里乌斯提出的星图写了一篇评论,在评论中,他纠正了苏托里乌斯的“天文错误”,并正确地重新计算了苏托里乌斯给出的日期和时间:594年4月23日上午10点。开普勒承认罗斯林的计算是正确的,但对日期本身持怀疑态度(其中一个原因是,穆罕默德太年轻了,不可能在622年完成他所做的事情,当时他和他的追随者从麦加(Hejira)起飞;他也想知道苏托里乌斯最初是从哪里得到这个日期的)。开普勒提到了穆罕默德的其他日期:公元569年(来自墨卡托);571年9月21日(摘自《古兰经》编年史,开普勒后来在节选中接受了这一编年史);及596年4月23日(来自“其他”,未指明尽管开普勒在这段节选中为穆罕默德提供了他自己提出的星图的位置,但它的图纸没有保存下来。现存的是苏托里乌斯提出的日期的方形图表。在讨论了罗斯林和苏托里乌斯的尝试之后,开普勒接着谈到了他自己对穆罕默德诞生的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信