FDI Legitimacy and MNC Subsidiary Control: From Legitimation to Competition

George Z. Peng
{"title":"FDI Legitimacy and MNC Subsidiary Control: From Legitimation to Competition","authors":"George Z. Peng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1957444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contributes to the subsidiary control literature by empirically demonstrating the importance of FDI legitimacy in determining subsidiary ownership and expatriate staffing levels. Based on organizational ecology theory (OET), our study considers the tension between legitimation and competition pressures. This is a significant step beyond institutional theory, which only accounts for the former pressure. Based on a sample of Japanese MNCs, we find that there is an interaction effect between subsidiary size and FDI legitimacy on both subsidiary ownership and expatriate staffing levels. With increasing FDI legitimacy, smaller subsidiaries tend to increase their ownership and expatriate staffing levels, whereas larger subsidiaries tend to reduce their ownership and expatriate staffing levels. The results hold both across host countries and over time. Our findings have significant theoretical and practical implications. MNCs are advised to give full attention to the dual pressure of legitimation and competition when determining subsidiary control strategies. Caution is advised when applying the institutional theory based prescription that MNCs should assume higher ownership and expatriate staffing levels in their subsidiaries with increasing FDI legitimacy.","PeriodicalId":333672,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Global Strategy & Tactics (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Global Strategy & Tactics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1957444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

This study contributes to the subsidiary control literature by empirically demonstrating the importance of FDI legitimacy in determining subsidiary ownership and expatriate staffing levels. Based on organizational ecology theory (OET), our study considers the tension between legitimation and competition pressures. This is a significant step beyond institutional theory, which only accounts for the former pressure. Based on a sample of Japanese MNCs, we find that there is an interaction effect between subsidiary size and FDI legitimacy on both subsidiary ownership and expatriate staffing levels. With increasing FDI legitimacy, smaller subsidiaries tend to increase their ownership and expatriate staffing levels, whereas larger subsidiaries tend to reduce their ownership and expatriate staffing levels. The results hold both across host countries and over time. Our findings have significant theoretical and practical implications. MNCs are advised to give full attention to the dual pressure of legitimation and competition when determining subsidiary control strategies. Caution is advised when applying the institutional theory based prescription that MNCs should assume higher ownership and expatriate staffing levels in their subsidiaries with increasing FDI legitimacy.
FDI合法性与跨国公司子公司控制:从合法性到竞争
本研究通过实证证明外商直接投资合法性在决定子公司所有权和外派人员水平方面的重要性,为子公司控制文献做出了贡献。基于组织生态学理论,本研究考虑了合法性与竞争压力之间的紧张关系。这是超越制度理论的重要一步,制度理论只能解释前一种压力。基于日本跨国公司的样本,我们发现子公司规模和FDI合法性对子公司所有权和外派人员水平都存在交互作用。随着外国直接投资合法性的增加,较小的子公司倾向于增加其所有权和外派人员水平,而较大的子公司倾向于减少其所有权和外派人员水平。研究结果在东道国和不同时期都适用。我们的研究结果具有重要的理论和实践意义。建议跨国公司在确定子公司控制策略时充分注意合法性和竞争的双重压力。在运用基于制度理论的处方时,建议谨慎,即跨国公司应在其子公司中承担更高的所有权和外籍员工水平,同时增加外国直接投资的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信