“Feminism is Eating Itself”: Women's Experiences and Perceptions of Lateral Violence Online

E. Jane
{"title":"“Feminism is Eating Itself”: Women's Experiences and Perceptions of Lateral Violence Online","authors":"E. Jane","doi":"10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While a growing body of literature reveals the prevalence of men's harassment and abuse of women online, scant research has been conducted into women's attacks on each other in digital networked environments. This chapter responds to this research gap by analyzing data obtained from qualitative interviews with Australian women who have received at times extremely savage cyberhate they know or strongly suspect was sent by other women. Drawing on scholarly literature on historical intra-feminism schisms – specifically what have been dubbed the “mommy wars” and the “sex wars” – this chapter argues that the conceptual lenses of internalized misogyny and lateral violence are useful in their framing of internecine conflict within marginalized groups as diagnostic of broader, systemic oppression rather than being solely the fault of individual actors. These lenses, however, require multiple caveats and have many limitations. In conclusion, I canvas the possibility that the pressure women may feel to present a united front in the interests of feminist politics could itself be considered an outcome of patriarchal oppression (even if performing solidarity is politically expedient and/or essential). As such, there might come a time when openly renouncing discourses of sisterhood and feeling free to disagree with, and even dislike, other women might be considered markers of liberation.","PeriodicalId":117534,"journal":{"name":"The Emerald International Handbook of Technology Facilitated Violence and Abuse","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Emerald International Handbook of Technology Facilitated Violence and Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83982-848-520211009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While a growing body of literature reveals the prevalence of men's harassment and abuse of women online, scant research has been conducted into women's attacks on each other in digital networked environments. This chapter responds to this research gap by analyzing data obtained from qualitative interviews with Australian women who have received at times extremely savage cyberhate they know or strongly suspect was sent by other women. Drawing on scholarly literature on historical intra-feminism schisms – specifically what have been dubbed the “mommy wars” and the “sex wars” – this chapter argues that the conceptual lenses of internalized misogyny and lateral violence are useful in their framing of internecine conflict within marginalized groups as diagnostic of broader, systemic oppression rather than being solely the fault of individual actors. These lenses, however, require multiple caveats and have many limitations. In conclusion, I canvas the possibility that the pressure women may feel to present a united front in the interests of feminist politics could itself be considered an outcome of patriarchal oppression (even if performing solidarity is politically expedient and/or essential). As such, there might come a time when openly renouncing discourses of sisterhood and feeling free to disagree with, and even dislike, other women might be considered markers of liberation.
“女权主义正在吞噬自己”:女性对网络横向暴力的经历和看法
尽管越来越多的文献揭示了男性在网上骚扰和虐待女性的普遍现象,但关于女性在数字网络环境中相互攻击的研究却很少。本章通过分析对澳大利亚女性的定性访谈获得的数据来回应这一研究差距,这些女性有时会收到她们知道或强烈怀疑是其他女性发送的极其野蛮的网络仇恨。借鉴历史上关于女权主义内部分裂的学术文献——特别是被称为“妈妈战争”和“性战争”的文献——本章认为,内化的厌女症和横向暴力的概念镜头在边缘群体内部自相残杀的冲突框架中是有用的,可以作为更广泛的系统性压迫的诊断,而不仅仅是个体行为者的错误。然而,这些镜头需要许多注意事项,并且有许多限制。综上所述,我认为女性为女权主义政治利益而表现出统一战线的压力本身可能被认为是父权压迫的结果(即使表现团结在政治上是权宜之计和/或必要的)。因此,可能会有这样一个时刻,公开放弃姐妹之情的话语,自由地不同意甚至不喜欢其他女性,这可能被视为解放的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信