{"title":"Talk in Political Economy: Welcome to Wagner’s World","authors":"Adam Martin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3333358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public choice economics, like most economics, typically assigns only a small role to various forms of talk between individuals. By contrast, throughout Richard Wagner’s oeuvre, there is an undercurrent of talk about talk. This essay argues that talk matters because of two key assumptions in Wagner’s approach to public choice. First, talk matters to the extent that individuals are ignorant. There are different forms of ignorance in economic theory which allow talk to communicate different sorts of information. Knightian uncertainty, however, also opens up the possibility that talk can do more. Second, talk matters when individuals have tuistic motivations. When individuals are moved to act based on the actions and judgments of others, talk becomes motivating as well as informative. I illustrate the power of talk in Wagner’s approach by examining the classic arguments put forward in Democracy in Deficit.","PeriodicalId":365118,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Public Choice: Analysis of Collective Decision-Making (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public choice economics, like most economics, typically assigns only a small role to various forms of talk between individuals. By contrast, throughout Richard Wagner’s oeuvre, there is an undercurrent of talk about talk. This essay argues that talk matters because of two key assumptions in Wagner’s approach to public choice. First, talk matters to the extent that individuals are ignorant. There are different forms of ignorance in economic theory which allow talk to communicate different sorts of information. Knightian uncertainty, however, also opens up the possibility that talk can do more. Second, talk matters when individuals have tuistic motivations. When individuals are moved to act based on the actions and judgments of others, talk becomes motivating as well as informative. I illustrate the power of talk in Wagner’s approach by examining the classic arguments put forward in Democracy in Deficit.
像大多数经济学一样,公共选择经济学通常只赋予个人之间各种形式的对话一个很小的角色。相比之下,在理查德·瓦格纳的全部作品中,有一种关于谈话的谈话的暗流。这篇文章认为谈话很重要,因为瓦格纳的公共选择方法有两个关键假设。首先,谈话的重要性在于个人是无知的。在经济理论中有不同形式的无知,这使得谈话可以传达不同种类的信息。然而,奈特式的不确定性也开启了一种可能性,即谈判可以发挥更大的作用。其次,当个人有双重动机时,谈话很重要。当个人根据他人的行为和判断采取行动时,谈话就变得既能激励人又能提供信息。我通过考察《赤字中的民主》(Democracy in Deficit)一书中提出的经典论点,来说明瓦格纳方法中谈话的力量。