Angelo Poliziano’s Coniurationis commentarium

Marta Celati
{"title":"Angelo Poliziano’s Coniurationis commentarium","authors":"Marta Celati","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fourth chapter focuses on Poliziano’s Coniurationis commentarium, the literary account of the Pazzi conspiracy against the Medici brothers, Lorenzo and Giuliano (1478). The critical analysis reconstructs the circumstances of composition of the text, its publication in two printed editions, and its circulation in the manuscript tradition, revealing that the work enjoyed widespread diffusion as the central pillar of pro-Medici propaganda. The investigation into the text shows that it totally adheres to the guidelines of Lorenzo de’ Medici’s cultural politics in the aftermath of the plot. The thorough examination of the changes made by Poliziano in the second version of the text confirms that its political perspective also mirrored the evolution of the political situation in Florence and in Italy in 1480. Despite being a highly propagandistic work, Poliziano’s Commentarium is also a sophisticated piece of literature produced by the eclectic combination of manifold sources drawn from the classical tradition: a conflation that reflects the humanist’s principle of docta\n varietas. The main prototype of Sallust is combined it with multiple references to a variety of models: other classical historians (Suetonius, Caesar, and Livy), poetry, comic authors (most of all Terence), and even technical literature (Celsus, Pliny the Elder, etc.). In particular, the extensive use of Suetonius, especially his biography of Caesar, conveys particular political overtones. One of the crucial ideological elements in the text is the representation of Lorenzo de’ Medici as an actual heroic prince, who is loved by his people and embodies the idea of the whole state.","PeriodicalId":270500,"journal":{"name":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conspiracy Literature in Early Renaissance Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198863625.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fourth chapter focuses on Poliziano’s Coniurationis commentarium, the literary account of the Pazzi conspiracy against the Medici brothers, Lorenzo and Giuliano (1478). The critical analysis reconstructs the circumstances of composition of the text, its publication in two printed editions, and its circulation in the manuscript tradition, revealing that the work enjoyed widespread diffusion as the central pillar of pro-Medici propaganda. The investigation into the text shows that it totally adheres to the guidelines of Lorenzo de’ Medici’s cultural politics in the aftermath of the plot. The thorough examination of the changes made by Poliziano in the second version of the text confirms that its political perspective also mirrored the evolution of the political situation in Florence and in Italy in 1480. Despite being a highly propagandistic work, Poliziano’s Commentarium is also a sophisticated piece of literature produced by the eclectic combination of manifold sources drawn from the classical tradition: a conflation that reflects the humanist’s principle of docta varietas. The main prototype of Sallust is combined it with multiple references to a variety of models: other classical historians (Suetonius, Caesar, and Livy), poetry, comic authors (most of all Terence), and even technical literature (Celsus, Pliny the Elder, etc.). In particular, the extensive use of Suetonius, especially his biography of Caesar, conveys particular political overtones. One of the crucial ideological elements in the text is the representation of Lorenzo de’ Medici as an actual heroic prince, who is loved by his people and embodies the idea of the whole state.
第四章着重于波利齐亚诺的《conurationis评论》,这是帕齐对美第奇兄弟洛伦佐和朱利亚诺(1478)阴谋的文学描述。批判性分析重建了文本的构成环境,它的两个印刷版本的出版,以及它在手稿传统中的流通,揭示了这部作品作为亲美第奇宣传的中心支柱而广泛传播。对文本的考察表明,它完全符合洛伦佐·德·美第奇在情节发生后的文化政治指导方针。对Poliziano在第二版文本中所做的修改进行的彻底检查证实,其政治观点也反映了1480年佛罗伦萨和意大利政治局势的演变。尽管是一部高度宣传的作品,波利齐亚诺的《评注》也是一部复杂的文学作品,它从古典传统中吸取了多种来源的折衷组合:这种合并反映了人文主义的多样性原则。萨洛斯特的主要原型是与多种参考模型相结合的:其他古典历史学家(苏托尼乌斯、凯撒和李维)、诗歌、喜剧作家(主要是特伦斯),甚至是技术文献(塞尔苏斯、老普林尼等)。特别是,大量使用苏托尼乌斯,特别是他的凯撒传记,传达了特殊的政治色彩。文本中一个重要的意识形态元素是把洛伦佐·德·美第奇描绘成一个真正的英雄王子,他受到人民的爱戴,体现了整个国家的理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信