On the Non-Feasibility of Special relativity

Donald Aucamp
{"title":"On the Non-Feasibility of Special relativity","authors":"Donald Aucamp","doi":"10.22259/2637-5826.0204003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is divided into three main parts which deal with the feasibility of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR).In Part 1two proofs that vary in complexity are given which show that Einstein’s necessary conditions are not sufficient conditions. The first of these proofs uses the same thought experiment employed in his paper, where it is shown that he didn’t look at his own one-way results. Thus, his round-trip transformations are correct and necessary, but not sufficient. The second proof shows the often-used railroad car thought experiment in many textbooks also fails. In Part 2 Einstein’s equation for mass, which is derived from and dependent on STR, is shown to be an untenable theory. Then in Part 3STR is proved be incorrect as based on this author’s paper on electromagnetic theory. Finally, in Part 4 the experimental verification of STR is challenged. A replacement theory for STR, including relativistic mass, is covered in the third paper in this series.","PeriodicalId":333499,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Physics","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22259/2637-5826.0204003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper is divided into three main parts which deal with the feasibility of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR).In Part 1two proofs that vary in complexity are given which show that Einstein’s necessary conditions are not sufficient conditions. The first of these proofs uses the same thought experiment employed in his paper, where it is shown that he didn’t look at his own one-way results. Thus, his round-trip transformations are correct and necessary, but not sufficient. The second proof shows the often-used railroad car thought experiment in many textbooks also fails. In Part 2 Einstein’s equation for mass, which is derived from and dependent on STR, is shown to be an untenable theory. Then in Part 3STR is proved be incorrect as based on this author’s paper on electromagnetic theory. Finally, in Part 4 the experimental verification of STR is challenged. A replacement theory for STR, including relativistic mass, is covered in the third paper in this series.
论狭义相对论的不可行性
本文分为三个主要部分,分别论述了狭义相对论的可行性。在第12部分,给出了两个复杂程度不同的证明,证明了爱因斯坦的必要条件不是充分条件。这些证明中的第一个使用了与他论文中使用的相同的思想实验,其中表明他没有考虑自己的单向结果。因此,他的往返转换是正确和必要的,但不是充分的。第二个证明表明,许多教科书中经常使用的火车思想实验也失败了。在第二部分中,爱因斯坦的质量方程是由STR导出并依赖于STR的,它被证明是一个站不住脚的理论。然后在第三部分中,根据作者的电磁理论论文,证明了这一理论是错误的。最后,在第四部分中对STR的实验验证提出了质疑。STR的替代理论,包括相对论质量,将在本系列的第三篇文章中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信