Charting Pathways to Completion for Low-Income Community College Students. CCRC Working Paper No. 34.

Davis Jenkins, M. Weiss
{"title":"Charting Pathways to Completion for Low-Income Community College Students. CCRC Working Paper No. 34.","authors":"Davis Jenkins, M. Weiss","doi":"10.7916/D8JM2JRF","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses administrative data from Washington State to chart the educational pathways of first-time community college students over seven years, with a focus on young, socioeconomically disadvantaged students. Of particular interest are the rates at which students enter a course of study (by passing multiple college-level courses within a focused field of study), the amount of remediation taken by students in each concentration, and the rates at which students in different concentrations earn certificates, earn associate degrees, or transfer to four-year institutions. We found that students from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds were less likely than higher SES students to enter a concentration, which we define as taking and passing at least three courses in a single field of study. Among those who did enter a concentration, low-SES students were less likely to concentrate in liberal arts and sciences and more likely to enter a concentration in career-technical education (CTE), where completion rates are lower. Low-SES students were overrepresented in fields such as education and childcare that have low completion rates, although they were well represented compared with high-SES students in nursing and allied health, which tend to have higher labor market returns for graduates. Overall, however, the majority of young students in our sample who entered a program of study—even low-SES young students— were more likely to do so in liberal arts and sciences than in career-technical programs. Some researchers and policy analysts have suggested that it would be beneficial to encourage more students into pathways that involve multiple, ―stackable‖ credentials in CTE fields with relatively high labor market returns. Given that liberal arts and sciences is the default pathway for the majority of younger students, convincing recent high school graduates to choose a CTE path would likely require a fundamental shift in the way high schools and community colleges guide and prepare young, first-time college students. Regardless of whether they concentrated in a CTE field or in liberal arts and sciences, however, low-SES students were less likely to earn a credential or transfer to a four-year institution.","PeriodicalId":218750,"journal":{"name":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Research Center, Columbia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8JM2JRF","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

This study uses administrative data from Washington State to chart the educational pathways of first-time community college students over seven years, with a focus on young, socioeconomically disadvantaged students. Of particular interest are the rates at which students enter a course of study (by passing multiple college-level courses within a focused field of study), the amount of remediation taken by students in each concentration, and the rates at which students in different concentrations earn certificates, earn associate degrees, or transfer to four-year institutions. We found that students from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds were less likely than higher SES students to enter a concentration, which we define as taking and passing at least three courses in a single field of study. Among those who did enter a concentration, low-SES students were less likely to concentrate in liberal arts and sciences and more likely to enter a concentration in career-technical education (CTE), where completion rates are lower. Low-SES students were overrepresented in fields such as education and childcare that have low completion rates, although they were well represented compared with high-SES students in nursing and allied health, which tend to have higher labor market returns for graduates. Overall, however, the majority of young students in our sample who entered a program of study—even low-SES young students— were more likely to do so in liberal arts and sciences than in career-technical programs. Some researchers and policy analysts have suggested that it would be beneficial to encourage more students into pathways that involve multiple, ―stackable‖ credentials in CTE fields with relatively high labor market returns. Given that liberal arts and sciences is the default pathway for the majority of younger students, convincing recent high school graduates to choose a CTE path would likely require a fundamental shift in the way high schools and community colleges guide and prepare young, first-time college students. Regardless of whether they concentrated in a CTE field or in liberal arts and sciences, however, low-SES students were less likely to earn a credential or transfer to a four-year institution.
绘制低收入社区大学生完成学业的路径。CCRC第34号工作文件
本研究使用华盛顿州的行政数据,绘制了七年来首次进入社区大学的学生的教育路径,重点关注年轻的、社会经济上处于不利地位的学生。特别令人感兴趣的是学生进入一门学习课程的比率(通过一个重点研究领域内的多个大学水平课程),每个专业的学生补习的数量,以及不同专业的学生获得证书、获得副学士学位或转到四年制大学的比率。我们发现,来自低社会经济地位(SES)背景的学生比高社会经济地位的学生更不可能进入一个集中的领域,我们将其定义为在一个研究领域学习并通过至少三门课程。在那些进入专业的学生中,低社会经济地位的学生不太可能专注于文科和理科,而更有可能进入职业技术教育(CTE)的专业,这一专业的完成率较低。低社会经济地位的学生在教育和儿童保育等毕业率较低的领域中所占比例过高,尽管与高社会经济地位的学生相比,他们在护理和相关健康领域的比例较高,而护理和相关健康领域的毕业生往往有更高的劳动力市场回报。然而,总的来说,在我们的样本中,大多数进入学习项目的年轻学生——即使是低社会经济地位的年轻学生——更有可能选择文科和理科,而不是职业技术项目。一些研究人员和政策分析人士建议,鼓励更多的学生进入涉及多个“可堆叠”的CTE领域的途径,这将是有益的,这些领域的劳动力市场回报相对较高。考虑到文科和理科是大多数年轻学生的默认途径,要说服刚毕业的高中毕业生选择CTE,可能需要高中和社区大学对年轻的、第一次上大学的学生的指导和准备方式进行根本性的转变。然而,无论他们是专注于CTE领域还是文科和理科,低经济地位的学生都不太可能获得证书或转到四年制大学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信