Effect of homeopathy on quality of corncobs naturally exposed to sugarcane virus

Mônica Filomena de Assis Souza, Kácio Gomes Macedo, David Junior de Oliveira Pereira, Graciela Andreia Flis Machado, L. V. S. Barbosa, Larissa Wolff Gonçalves, ², Pedro Henrique de Souza Cucco, M. Cucco, K. B. Brum
{"title":"Effect of homeopathy on quality of corncobs naturally exposed to sugarcane virus","authors":"Mônica Filomena de Assis Souza, Kácio Gomes Macedo, David Junior de Oliveira Pereira, Graciela Andreia Flis Machado, L. V. S. Barbosa, Larissa Wolff Gonçalves, ², Pedro Henrique de Souza Cucco, M. Cucco, K. B. Brum","doi":"10.51910/ijhdr.v21i1.1169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of pesticides is damaging to the health of farmers and consumers as their use is associated with numerous diseases. Homeopathy is one of the techniques for organic agriculture currently authorized by the MAPA. Aims: To assess the effect of homeopathic compounds on corncob quality in pesticide-free cultures. Methodology: The experiment was performed in, MS-Brazil. Two culture fields were used, each 30m2in size. The homeopathic group treatment consisted of 1ml of30% hydroalcoholic solution with homeopathic ingredients. This solution was diluted into 30ml of water and then sprayed onto 100 seeds. The control group was submitted to the same protocol excluding the homeopathic ingredients. The homeopathic ingredients used were Sulph9C, Mag-c 12C, and Calc-p9C, prescribed according to Materia Medica instructions. The evaluation was performed at harvest by comparing the average weight of 1000 kernels per group, obtained from a weighing of 3000 kernels per group. In addition, a number of corncobs from both groups were qualitatively evaluated as “good” or “bad.” Statistics analysis used the T-test to compare the kernel weight averages and Fisher’s exact test to analyze the corncob quality frequency. Both groups were naturally infected by a virus from a neighboring sugarcane field, causing qualitative and quantitative losses on both groups. Results and discussion: The average weight of 1000 kernels from the treated group (329 g) was not significantly greater (p=0.06) than the average weight of 1000 kernels from the non-treated group (308 g). It was observed that 71out of 158 (44.9%) corncobs from the homeopathic treatment group were classified as “good” while zero out of 50 (0%) corncobs from the non-treated group were classified as “good”, resulting in a significant difference (p<0.01). Conclusion: Homeopathic compounds can be used as a feasible treatment for health and productivity in the corn crop.","PeriodicalId":106057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51910/ijhdr.v21i1.1169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of pesticides is damaging to the health of farmers and consumers as their use is associated with numerous diseases. Homeopathy is one of the techniques for organic agriculture currently authorized by the MAPA. Aims: To assess the effect of homeopathic compounds on corncob quality in pesticide-free cultures. Methodology: The experiment was performed in, MS-Brazil. Two culture fields were used, each 30m2in size. The homeopathic group treatment consisted of 1ml of30% hydroalcoholic solution with homeopathic ingredients. This solution was diluted into 30ml of water and then sprayed onto 100 seeds. The control group was submitted to the same protocol excluding the homeopathic ingredients. The homeopathic ingredients used were Sulph9C, Mag-c 12C, and Calc-p9C, prescribed according to Materia Medica instructions. The evaluation was performed at harvest by comparing the average weight of 1000 kernels per group, obtained from a weighing of 3000 kernels per group. In addition, a number of corncobs from both groups were qualitatively evaluated as “good” or “bad.” Statistics analysis used the T-test to compare the kernel weight averages and Fisher’s exact test to analyze the corncob quality frequency. Both groups were naturally infected by a virus from a neighboring sugarcane field, causing qualitative and quantitative losses on both groups. Results and discussion: The average weight of 1000 kernels from the treated group (329 g) was not significantly greater (p=0.06) than the average weight of 1000 kernels from the non-treated group (308 g). It was observed that 71out of 158 (44.9%) corncobs from the homeopathic treatment group were classified as “good” while zero out of 50 (0%) corncobs from the non-treated group were classified as “good”, resulting in a significant difference (p<0.01). Conclusion: Homeopathic compounds can be used as a feasible treatment for health and productivity in the corn crop.
顺势疗法对自然暴露于甘蔗病毒的玉米芯品质的影响
背景:农药的使用对农民和消费者的健康有害,因为农药的使用与许多疾病有关。顺势疗法是目前被MAPA批准的有机农业技术之一。目的:评价顺势疗法化合物对无农药培养玉米芯品质的影响。方法:实验在MS-Brazil进行。使用了两个培养场,每个培养场的大小为30m2。顺势疗法组为含顺势疗法成分的30%水酒精溶液1ml。将该溶液稀释成30ml水,喷洒在100粒种子上。对照组接受相同的治疗方案,但不含顺势疗法成分。顺势疗法使用的成分是硫酸c,镁- 12C和钙- p9c,根据本草说明规定。在收获时通过比较每组1000粒的平均重量进行评估,每组称重3000粒。此外,两组的玉米芯都被定性地评价为“好”或“坏”。统计分析采用t检验比较籽粒质量平均值和Fisher精确检验分析玉米芯质量频次。两组自然感染了来自邻近甘蔗田的一种病毒,造成两组在质量和数量上的损失。结果与讨论:治疗组的1000粒平均重量(329 g)与未治疗组的1000粒平均重量(308 g)相比,差异无统计学意义(p=0.06)。观察到,顺势疗法治疗组的158粒玉米芯中有71粒(44.9%)为“好”,而未治疗组的50粒玉米芯中有0粒(0%)为“好”,差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。结论:顺势疗法化合物可作为玉米作物健康和生产的一种可行的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信