Locating the Human in Doctrine

K. Parker
{"title":"Locating the Human in Doctrine","authors":"K. Parker","doi":"10.1080/23296151.2017.1384272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2013, top U.S. Army, Marine Corps, and Special Operations Command military leaders chartered the Strategic Landpower Task Force to examine the concept of a human domain and inform whether to adopt it into doctrine. The Department of Defense (DoD) should not adopt human domain into doctrine. However, examining human in war illuminates opportunities to improve joint doctrine by developing precise terminology for the many facets of humanness in war. This article explores human domain, human dimension, human factors, and human capital. It also proposes re-evaluating defeat mechanisms to consider human factors and how military operations influence adversary decisions. Human domain concepts have gained attention in the land services and special operations, especially in population-centric conflicts, but the importance of human factors goes beyond these limited viewpoints. Since war is an inherently human endeavor, DoD should evaluate human factors across all domains and joint operations so the concepts are not unnecessarily constrained.","PeriodicalId":276818,"journal":{"name":"Special Operations Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Operations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23296151.2017.1384272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2013, top U.S. Army, Marine Corps, and Special Operations Command military leaders chartered the Strategic Landpower Task Force to examine the concept of a human domain and inform whether to adopt it into doctrine. The Department of Defense (DoD) should not adopt human domain into doctrine. However, examining human in war illuminates opportunities to improve joint doctrine by developing precise terminology for the many facets of humanness in war. This article explores human domain, human dimension, human factors, and human capital. It also proposes re-evaluating defeat mechanisms to consider human factors and how military operations influence adversary decisions. Human domain concepts have gained attention in the land services and special operations, especially in population-centric conflicts, but the importance of human factors goes beyond these limited viewpoints. Since war is an inherently human endeavor, DoD should evaluate human factors across all domains and joint operations so the concepts are not unnecessarily constrained.
在教义中定位人
2013年,美国陆军、海军陆战队和特种作战司令部的高级军事领导人授权战略陆地力量特遣部队研究人类领域的概念,并告知是否将其纳入理论。国防部(DoD)不应该将人类领域纳入军事理论。然而,通过研究战争中的人性揭示了通过发展战争中人性的许多方面的精确术语来改进联合理论的机会。本文探讨了人的领域、人的维度、人的因素和人力资本。它还建议重新评估失败机制,以考虑人为因素以及军事行动如何影响对手的决策。人的领域概念在土地服务和特种作战中,特别是在以人口为中心的冲突中得到了关注,但人的因素的重要性超出了这些有限的观点。由于战争本质上是人类的努力,国防部应该评估所有领域和联合作战中的人为因素,这样概念就不会受到不必要的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信