ACP vs CPP-ACP: The better formula for caries control

Sanjana R. Kodical, Attiguppe R. Prabhakar, Raju O.S.
{"title":"ACP vs CPP-ACP: The better formula for caries control","authors":"Sanjana R. Kodical, Attiguppe R. Prabhakar, Raju O.S.","doi":"10.54276/jupd.2021.1108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of two 5% sodium fluoride varnishes containing amorphous calcium phosphate and casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate respectively on the plaque pH, salivary fluoride ion release and patient acceptability. Methods: Seventy children were selected from a residential school for the study. Baseline plaque pH, salivary fluoride ion levels were determined. Varnish application was made, and the plaque pH and salivary fluoride ion release were determined at 24 hours, 3 months’ and 6 months’ post varnish application. Patient acceptability was determined immediately after varnish application. Results: No difference in the plaque pH and salivary fluoride ion levels were obtained among the two study groups at all tested time intervals. However, there was a difference in the salivary fluoride ion levels at baseline and at all the three post interventional time periods for both the groups, i.e., at 24 hours (for Group 1 p= 0.00 for Group 2 p=0.00), at 3 months (for Group 1 p=0.00 for Group 2 p=0.00) and at 6 months (for Group 1 p= 0.00 for Group 2 p=0.00). There was no statistically significant difference was observed in the patient acceptability between the two groups (p=0.709). Conclusion: Both the fluoride varnishes can be considered to be equally efficacious when compared based on","PeriodicalId":332603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of updates in Pediatric Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of updates in Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54276/jupd.2021.1108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of two 5% sodium fluoride varnishes containing amorphous calcium phosphate and casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate respectively on the plaque pH, salivary fluoride ion release and patient acceptability. Methods: Seventy children were selected from a residential school for the study. Baseline plaque pH, salivary fluoride ion levels were determined. Varnish application was made, and the plaque pH and salivary fluoride ion release were determined at 24 hours, 3 months’ and 6 months’ post varnish application. Patient acceptability was determined immediately after varnish application. Results: No difference in the plaque pH and salivary fluoride ion levels were obtained among the two study groups at all tested time intervals. However, there was a difference in the salivary fluoride ion levels at baseline and at all the three post interventional time periods for both the groups, i.e., at 24 hours (for Group 1 p= 0.00 for Group 2 p=0.00), at 3 months (for Group 1 p=0.00 for Group 2 p=0.00) and at 6 months (for Group 1 p= 0.00 for Group 2 p=0.00). There was no statistically significant difference was observed in the patient acceptability between the two groups (p=0.709). Conclusion: Both the fluoride varnishes can be considered to be equally efficacious when compared based on
ACP与CPP-ACP:控制龋齿的更好配方
目的:评价比较两种含无定形磷酸钙和酪蛋白磷酸肽无定形磷酸钙的5%氟化钠清漆对牙菌斑pH、唾液氟离子释放及患者可接受性的影响。方法:选取一所寄宿学校的70名儿童进行研究。测定基线斑块pH值、唾液氟离子水平。涂上清漆后,分别于24小时、3个月和6个月测定牙菌斑pH值和唾液氟离子释放量。在清漆应用后立即确定患者的可接受性。结果:在所有测试时间间隔内,两个研究组的牙菌斑pH值和唾液氟离子水平均无差异。然而,两组在基线和干预后三个时间段的唾液氟化物离子水平都有差异,即24小时(第1组p=0.00,第2组p=0.00)、3个月(第1组p=0.00,第2组p=0.00)和6个月(第1组p=0.00,第2组p=0.00)。两组患者接受度差异无统计学意义(p=0.709)。结论:两种氟化物清漆均具有相同的效果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信