A Review of Passive Cooling Technology Performance Testing Methods

David A. Young, E. Stefanakos, D. Goswami
{"title":"A Review of Passive Cooling Technology Performance Testing Methods","authors":"David A. Young, E. Stefanakos, D. Goswami","doi":"10.1115/es2022-81877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent research has shown that it is possible to achieve significant cooling by radiative methods without the use of mechanical equipment that require significant amount of electrical power. These passive cooling methods rely on reflecting most of the solar radiation and emitting radiation in the “atmospheric window” wavelength ranges where the atmosphere is transparent, so that a surface exchanges radiation directly with the extremely cold outer space. This literature review noted that almost all published experimental studies on radiative cooling were conducted under different environmental conditions and methodologies, making it almost impossible to compare the results. In this paper, we present a literature review, focusing on daytime radiative cooling performance, that showed an array of testing methods and environmental conditions, leading to the research question of how these technologies would compare with the same testing standard. Slight variations in environmental conditions, setup, and instrumentation from one experiment to another can present large differences in reported performance, even for the same passive radiative cooling device. Examples of setups include non-standard insulated testing chambers, convection barriers, vacuum chambers, shading devices, and instruments like feedback heaters, pyranometers, infrared radiometers and thermocouples. The testing methods reviewed point to the need for a standard cooling potential performance measurement method for the advancement of passive radiative cooling technology.","PeriodicalId":384147,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2022 16th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2022 16th International Conference on Energy Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/es2022-81877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research has shown that it is possible to achieve significant cooling by radiative methods without the use of mechanical equipment that require significant amount of electrical power. These passive cooling methods rely on reflecting most of the solar radiation and emitting radiation in the “atmospheric window” wavelength ranges where the atmosphere is transparent, so that a surface exchanges radiation directly with the extremely cold outer space. This literature review noted that almost all published experimental studies on radiative cooling were conducted under different environmental conditions and methodologies, making it almost impossible to compare the results. In this paper, we present a literature review, focusing on daytime radiative cooling performance, that showed an array of testing methods and environmental conditions, leading to the research question of how these technologies would compare with the same testing standard. Slight variations in environmental conditions, setup, and instrumentation from one experiment to another can present large differences in reported performance, even for the same passive radiative cooling device. Examples of setups include non-standard insulated testing chambers, convection barriers, vacuum chambers, shading devices, and instruments like feedback heaters, pyranometers, infrared radiometers and thermocouples. The testing methods reviewed point to the need for a standard cooling potential performance measurement method for the advancement of passive radiative cooling technology.
被动冷却技术性能测试方法综述
最近的研究表明,不使用需要大量电力的机械设备,通过辐射方法实现显著的冷却是可能的。这些被动冷却方法依赖于反射大部分太阳辐射,并在大气透明的“大气窗口”波长范围内发射辐射,从而使表面直接与极冷的外层空间交换辐射。本文献综述指出,几乎所有已发表的关于辐射冷却的实验研究都是在不同的环境条件和方法下进行的,因此几乎不可能对结果进行比较。在本文中,我们提出了一项文献综述,重点是白天辐射冷却性能,显示了一系列测试方法和环境条件,导致这些技术如何与相同的测试标准进行比较的研究问题。在不同的实验中,环境条件、设置和仪器的微小变化可能会导致报告的性能存在很大差异,即使对于相同的被动辐射冷却装置也是如此。设置的例子包括非标准绝缘测试室,对流屏障,真空室,遮阳装置和仪器,如反馈加热器,高温计,红外辐射计和热电偶。对测试方法的回顾表明,为了推进被动辐射冷却技术,需要一种标准的冷却电位性能测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信