Test of Oil Lubricant Viscosity by Using Hall Effect Sensor

W. Sriratana, Sethawut Nakklinkoon, S. Satthamsakul
{"title":"Test of Oil Lubricant Viscosity by Using Hall Effect Sensor","authors":"W. Sriratana, Sethawut Nakklinkoon, S. Satthamsakul","doi":"10.1109/ICEAST.2018.8434468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the test of oil lubricant. The viscosity of lubricant would decrease and the replacement of lubricant is required when the lubricant is used for a period of time. Hence, viscosity is a major factor that can indicate the quality of the lubricant. The fundamental method known as falling ball viscometer that is basically from Archimedes' principle including Newton's laws of motion were applied for the test. The sphere shaped object was replaced by a standard disc with the drill holes. The experiment was conducted by four new lubricant samples: SAE10W-30, SAE15W-40, SAE20W-50 and SAE90. From the reference position, the standard disc was released to the lubricant container and a timer was counted simultaneously by the microcontroller. The timer was stopped when Hall Effect sensor detected the disc at the bottom of the container. Falling time was compared to the viscosity from the standard rotational Viscometer, namely Brookfield Viscometer model DV-II+Pro to assess the relationship equation between falling time and viscosity. From study, the average error of falling time measurement was 0.109 Sec or 2.106% and the average viscosity error from the equation was 6.171 cP or 3.089% at room temperature (27°C). In addition, comparing to the standard Viscometer, the average percentage error was about 2.113%. Even though the accuracy of this method would not be outstanding, it is efficient with cost advantage compared to the expensive standard Viscometer.","PeriodicalId":138654,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences, and Technology (ICEAST)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences, and Technology (ICEAST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEAST.2018.8434468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents the test of oil lubricant. The viscosity of lubricant would decrease and the replacement of lubricant is required when the lubricant is used for a period of time. Hence, viscosity is a major factor that can indicate the quality of the lubricant. The fundamental method known as falling ball viscometer that is basically from Archimedes' principle including Newton's laws of motion were applied for the test. The sphere shaped object was replaced by a standard disc with the drill holes. The experiment was conducted by four new lubricant samples: SAE10W-30, SAE15W-40, SAE20W-50 and SAE90. From the reference position, the standard disc was released to the lubricant container and a timer was counted simultaneously by the microcontroller. The timer was stopped when Hall Effect sensor detected the disc at the bottom of the container. Falling time was compared to the viscosity from the standard rotational Viscometer, namely Brookfield Viscometer model DV-II+Pro to assess the relationship equation between falling time and viscosity. From study, the average error of falling time measurement was 0.109 Sec or 2.106% and the average viscosity error from the equation was 6.171 cP or 3.089% at room temperature (27°C). In addition, comparing to the standard Viscometer, the average percentage error was about 2.113%. Even though the accuracy of this method would not be outstanding, it is efficient with cost advantage compared to the expensive standard Viscometer.
用霍尔效应传感器测试润滑油粘度
本文介绍了润滑油的试验。润滑油使用一段时间后,粘度会下降,需要更换润滑油。因此,粘度是一个主要的因素,可以表明润滑剂的质量。测试采用的基本方法是落球粘度计,这一方法基本上来自阿基米德原理,包括牛顿运动定律。球体形状的物体被一个带有钻孔的标准圆盘所取代。实验采用SAE10W-30、SAE15W-40、SAE20W-50和SAE90四种新型润滑油样品进行。从参考位置开始,将标准圆盘释放到润滑剂容器中,并由单片机同时计时。当霍尔效应传感器检测到容器底部的圆盘时,计时器停止。将下降时间与标准旋转粘度计的粘度进行比较,即Brookfield粘度计模型DV-II+Pro,以评估下降时间与粘度的关系方程。研究结果表明,在室温(27℃)下,下降时间测量的平均误差为0.109秒(2.106%),由方程得到的平均粘度误差为6.171 cP(3.089%)。与标准粘度计相比,平均百分比误差约为2.113%。尽管这种方法的准确性不是很突出,但与昂贵的标准粘度计相比,它是有效的,具有成本优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信