THE EXISTENCE OF THE GOVERNOR'S SUPERVISION OF REGIONAL REGULATIONS AND REGIONAL HEAD REGULATIONS OF REGENCY/CITY IN THE UNITED STATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Raymoon Brando Edwin Tampemawa
{"title":"THE EXISTENCE OF THE GOVERNOR'S SUPERVISION OF REGIONAL REGULATIONS AND REGIONAL HEAD REGULATIONS OF REGENCY/CITY IN THE UNITED STATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA","authors":"Raymoon Brando Edwin Tampemawa","doi":"10.32535/jcda.v5i3.1797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of the Governor as a representative of the Government in this era of broad autonomy is very strategic, where as the holder of the mandate from the President to oversee Regional Regulations and Regional Head Regulations of Regency/City need to be strengthened. After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015, Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 120 of 2018, which essentially regulates the addition of Verification in preventive supervision, and changes in form from Cancellation to Clarification in repressive supervision. However, with the amendment of Article 251 of Law Number 23 of 2014 through Article 176 Point 3 of Law Number 11 of 2020, repressive supervision is no longer known. In contrast to Law Number 1 of 2022, repressive supervision of Regional Regulations concerning Regional Taxes and Levies is regulated, but it is no longer the authority of the Governor, but has been handled directly by the Central Government. This fact of legal norms weakens the existence of the Governor's supervision of Regional Regulations and Regional Head Regulations of Regency/City, so that an ideal concept is needed in the form of structural integration; through the establishment of regional regulatory bodies, as well as substantially; through the implementation of integrated supervisory regulations under the coordination of regional regulatory agencies, which are managed digitally. Key words: Supervision; Local Regulation/Regional Head Regulation; Unitary State.","PeriodicalId":410101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Community Development in Asia","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Community Development in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v5i3.1797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of the Governor as a representative of the Government in this era of broad autonomy is very strategic, where as the holder of the mandate from the President to oversee Regional Regulations and Regional Head Regulations of Regency/City need to be strengthened. After the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015, Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 120 of 2018, which essentially regulates the addition of Verification in preventive supervision, and changes in form from Cancellation to Clarification in repressive supervision. However, with the amendment of Article 251 of Law Number 23 of 2014 through Article 176 Point 3 of Law Number 11 of 2020, repressive supervision is no longer known. In contrast to Law Number 1 of 2022, repressive supervision of Regional Regulations concerning Regional Taxes and Levies is regulated, but it is no longer the authority of the Governor, but has been handled directly by the Central Government. This fact of legal norms weakens the existence of the Governor's supervision of Regional Regulations and Regional Head Regulations of Regency/City, so that an ideal concept is needed in the form of structural integration; through the establishment of regional regulatory bodies, as well as substantially; through the implementation of integrated supervisory regulations under the coordination of regional regulatory agencies, which are managed digitally. Key words: Supervision; Local Regulation/Regional Head Regulation; Unitary State.
印度尼西亚共和国合众国存在总督监督区域条例和摄政/城市区域首长条例的情况
在这个广泛自治的时代,总督作为政府代表的作用非常具有战略意义,因为作为总统授权的持有人,需要加强监督摄政/城市的区域法规和区域负责人法规。继宪法法院第137/PUU-XIII/2015号决定之后,2018年内政部第120号条例实质上规定了预防性监督中增加的核查,以及压制性监督中从取消到澄清的形式变化。然而,随着2014年第23号法律第251条和2020年第11号法律第176条第3点的修改,压制性监督不再为人所知。与2022年第1号法律相反,对有关地区税收和征费的地区法规的压制性监督受到管制,但它不再是总督的权力,而是由中央政府直接处理。这一法律规范的事实削弱了总督对区域条例和摄政/城市区域首长条例的监督的存在,因此需要以结构一体化的形式形成一个理想的概念;通过建立区域监管机构,以及实质性;通过实施区域监管机构协调下的综合监管法规,进行数字化管理。关键词:监管;地方法规/区域主管法规;单一制国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信