The Goofy Roots of the Plain Language Movement: Reconsidering the Rhetorical Hedonism of ‘Gobbledygook Has Gotta Go’

Daniel Liddle
{"title":"The Goofy Roots of the Plain Language Movement: Reconsidering the Rhetorical Hedonism of ‘Gobbledygook Has Gotta Go’","authors":"Daniel Liddle","doi":"10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plain language guidelines are commonly deployed across professional writing disciplines. In pursuit of wide public audiences, contemporary guidelines often written using the style they prescribe: through unadorned presentation lacking in stylistic flair. This was not always the case. This article explores the humor and personality of one of the most popular early examples of plain language guidelines. In noting this stylistic incongruity between the past and present, the author argues for the value and difficulty of adding these stylized elements.","PeriodicalId":423952,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plain language guidelines are commonly deployed across professional writing disciplines. In pursuit of wide public audiences, contemporary guidelines often written using the style they prescribe: through unadorned presentation lacking in stylistic flair. This was not always the case. This article explores the humor and personality of one of the most popular early examples of plain language guidelines. In noting this stylistic incongruity between the past and present, the author argues for the value and difficulty of adding these stylized elements.
通俗语言运动的愚蠢根源:重新思考“官样文章必须离开”的修辞享乐主义
通俗易懂的语言指南通常在专业写作学科中使用。为了追求广泛的公众受众,当代指南经常使用他们规定的风格来编写:通过缺乏风格天赋的朴实呈现。但情况并非总是如此。这篇文章探讨了幽默和个性的一个最流行的早期例子,简单的语言指导方针。在注意到过去和现在之间的这种风格不协调时,作者认为增加这些风格化元素的价值和困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信