Comparing segmentation strategies for efficient video passage retrieval

Christian Wartena
{"title":"Comparing segmentation strategies for efficient video passage retrieval","authors":"Christian Wartena","doi":"10.1109/CBMI.2012.6269850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare the effect of different text segmentation strategies on speech based passage retrieval of video. Passage retrieval has mainly been studied to improve document retrieval and to enable question answering. In these domains best results were obtained using passages defined by the paragraph structure of the source documents or by using arbitrary overlapping passages. For the retrieval of relevant passages in a video, using speech transcripts, no author defined segmentation is available. We compare retrieval results from 4 different types of segments based on the speech channel of the video: fixed length segments, a sliding window, semantically coherent segments and prosodic segments. We evaluated the methods on the corpus of the MediaEval 2011 Rich Speech Retrieval task. Our main conclusion is that the retrieval results highly depend on the right choice for the segment length. However, results using the segmentation into semantically coherent parts depend much less on the segment length. Especially, the quality of fixed length and sliding window segmentation drops fast when the segment length increases, while quality of the semantically coherent segments is much more stable. Thus, if coherent segments are defined, longer segments can be used and consequently less segments have to be considered at retrieval time.","PeriodicalId":120769,"journal":{"name":"2012 10th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 10th International Workshop on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMI.2012.6269850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

We compare the effect of different text segmentation strategies on speech based passage retrieval of video. Passage retrieval has mainly been studied to improve document retrieval and to enable question answering. In these domains best results were obtained using passages defined by the paragraph structure of the source documents or by using arbitrary overlapping passages. For the retrieval of relevant passages in a video, using speech transcripts, no author defined segmentation is available. We compare retrieval results from 4 different types of segments based on the speech channel of the video: fixed length segments, a sliding window, semantically coherent segments and prosodic segments. We evaluated the methods on the corpus of the MediaEval 2011 Rich Speech Retrieval task. Our main conclusion is that the retrieval results highly depend on the right choice for the segment length. However, results using the segmentation into semantically coherent parts depend much less on the segment length. Especially, the quality of fixed length and sliding window segmentation drops fast when the segment length increases, while quality of the semantically coherent segments is much more stable. Thus, if coherent segments are defined, longer segments can be used and consequently less segments have to be considered at retrieval time.
视频片段高效检索的分割策略比较
我们比较了不同的文本分割策略对基于语音的视频段落检索的影响。文章检索的研究主要是为了提高文献检索和实现问答。在这些领域中,使用由源文档的段落结构定义的段落或使用任意重叠的段落可以获得最佳结果。对于视频中相关段落的检索,使用语音记录,没有作者定义的分割可用。我们比较了基于视频语音通道的4种不同类型片段的检索结果:固定长度片段、滑动窗口片段、语义连贯片段和韵律片段。我们在MediaEval 2011富语音检索任务的语料库上评估了这些方法。我们的主要结论是,检索结果高度依赖于正确选择的片段长度。然而,使用分割成语义上连贯的部分的结果对片段长度的依赖要小得多。特别是固定长度和滑动窗口分割的质量随片段长度的增加而下降,而语义连贯的片段质量则稳定得多。因此,如果定义了相干段,则可以使用更长的段,从而在检索时必须考虑更少的段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信