New Dimensions of Musicology of the 21st Century: the Experience in Modelling the Interpretative Theory of Musical Communication

Yuliya Nikolayevska
{"title":"New Dimensions of Musicology of the 21st Century: the Experience in Modelling the Interpretative Theory of Musical Communication","authors":"Yuliya Nikolayevska","doi":"10.31318/2522-4190.2021.131.243200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance of the study. The relevance of the topic is associated with the formulation of the basic principles of the theory of musical interpretation in its interpretative dimension.\nNovelty. The novelty of the research lies in the understanding of musical communication as an interpretative phenomenon.\nThe purpose of the research is to propose a model of the interpretative theory of musical communication for the development of the existing concepts.\nMethodology. Based on the research in modern humanities (M. Bakhtin, J. Habermas, H. Gumbrecht, S. Zizek, M. McLuhan, E. Levinas, J. Austin, D. Sperber, U. Eco), the theory of musical communication (E. Turner, A. Yakupov, V. Medushevsky, B. Syuta) and the theory of musical interpretation (Jean-Jacques Nathiez, T. Adorno, J. Brele, H. Danuzer, E. Gurenko, N. Korikhalova, V. Medushevsky, V. Moskalenko, L. Shapovalova, A. Samoilenko) a new look at the artistic processes of the 20th and early 21st centuries has been proposed. The main is the modeling method.\nResults and conclusions. For the development of the classical and relevant theories of communication (the main difference of the first is the recognition as the central element of the system the composition as a code, the essence of the second — the existence as the central element of a “musical-communicative event” and attention to the intentions of the communicants, the context of events, which determines their adequate understanding), the model of the interpretative theory of musical communication, in which both approaches are combined, has been introduced. We have introduced into the conceptual apparatus of musical science the type of Homo Interpretatus, which is the creator of a new modern musical reality and can be designated as a summary image of a person who, in the process of musical activity, manifests the dominance of interpreting thinking (in the unity and variety of the functions “composer — performer — listener — researcher”). The concept of “communication strategy” has been proposed, which is understood as the conscious action of the communicant (the intention directed at the Other in the process of creative communication). The typology of communication strategies has been presented: taking into account the type of creative activity (composing, performing, researching, listening) and based on their different forms of working with the material / text, as well as the focus on perception (in particular, idioethnic, modelling, actualizing, integrating, the strategy of style divergence / convergence, active, passive, total randomness, etc.).\nSignificance. The significance of the results lies in the systematic presentation of the positions of the interpretive theory of musical communication, which opens up prospects for further research on the interpretive processes of the 21st century.","PeriodicalId":143313,"journal":{"name":"Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine","volume":"286 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2021.131.243200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance of the study. The relevance of the topic is associated with the formulation of the basic principles of the theory of musical interpretation in its interpretative dimension. Novelty. The novelty of the research lies in the understanding of musical communication as an interpretative phenomenon. The purpose of the research is to propose a model of the interpretative theory of musical communication for the development of the existing concepts. Methodology. Based on the research in modern humanities (M. Bakhtin, J. Habermas, H. Gumbrecht, S. Zizek, M. McLuhan, E. Levinas, J. Austin, D. Sperber, U. Eco), the theory of musical communication (E. Turner, A. Yakupov, V. Medushevsky, B. Syuta) and the theory of musical interpretation (Jean-Jacques Nathiez, T. Adorno, J. Brele, H. Danuzer, E. Gurenko, N. Korikhalova, V. Medushevsky, V. Moskalenko, L. Shapovalova, A. Samoilenko) a new look at the artistic processes of the 20th and early 21st centuries has been proposed. The main is the modeling method. Results and conclusions. For the development of the classical and relevant theories of communication (the main difference of the first is the recognition as the central element of the system the composition as a code, the essence of the second — the existence as the central element of a “musical-communicative event” and attention to the intentions of the communicants, the context of events, which determines their adequate understanding), the model of the interpretative theory of musical communication, in which both approaches are combined, has been introduced. We have introduced into the conceptual apparatus of musical science the type of Homo Interpretatus, which is the creator of a new modern musical reality and can be designated as a summary image of a person who, in the process of musical activity, manifests the dominance of interpreting thinking (in the unity and variety of the functions “composer — performer — listener — researcher”). The concept of “communication strategy” has been proposed, which is understood as the conscious action of the communicant (the intention directed at the Other in the process of creative communication). The typology of communication strategies has been presented: taking into account the type of creative activity (composing, performing, researching, listening) and based on their different forms of working with the material / text, as well as the focus on perception (in particular, idioethnic, modelling, actualizing, integrating, the strategy of style divergence / convergence, active, passive, total randomness, etc.). Significance. The significance of the results lies in the systematic presentation of the positions of the interpretive theory of musical communication, which opens up prospects for further research on the interpretive processes of the 21st century.
21世纪音乐学的新维度:音乐传播诠释理论建模的经验
研究的相关性。该主题的相关性与音乐诠释理论的基本原则在其诠释维度的形成有关。本研究的新颖之处在于将音乐传播理解为一种解释性现象。本研究的目的是为现有概念的发展提出一个音乐传播解释性理论的模型。在现代人文学科(巴赫金、哈贝马斯、冈布莱希特、齐泽克、麦克卢汉、列维纳斯、奥斯汀、斯伯伯、艾柯)研究的基础上,音乐传播理论(特纳、雅库波夫、梅杜舍夫斯基、苏塔)和音乐诠释理论(让-雅克·纳提兹、阿多诺、布雷尔、达努泽、古伦科、科里哈洛娃、梅杜舍夫斯基、莫斯卡连科、沙波瓦洛娃、a . Samoilenko)对20世纪和21世纪初的艺术进程提出了新的看法。主要是建模方法。结果和结论。对于经典传播理论和相关传播理论的发展(前者的主要区别在于承认作为系统的中心要素的构成作为一种代码,后者的本质作为“音乐交际事件”的中心元素的存在和对交际者意图的关注(事件的背景,决定了他们的充分理解),音乐交际的解释理论模型,其中两种方法相结合,已经被引入。我们在音乐科学的概念装置中引入了“阐释人”(Homo Interpretatus)这一类型,它是一种新的现代音乐现实的创造者,是在音乐活动过程中(在“作曲家-表演者-听众-研究者”的统一和多样的功能中)表现出阐释思维主导地位的人的概括形象。人们提出了“传播策略”的概念,将其理解为传播者的有意识行为(在创造性传播过程中针对他者的意图)。提出了传播策略的类型学:考虑到创造性活动的类型(作曲、表演、研究、倾听),并基于他们与材料/文本的不同工作形式,以及对感知的关注(特别是独特的、建模的、实现的、整合的、风格分歧/趋同的策略、主动的、被动的、完全随机的等)。研究结果的意义在于系统地呈现了音乐传播阐释理论的立场,为21世纪阐释过程的进一步研究开辟了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信