Reading the Waves: Continuity and Change in Ocean Lawmaking

Gregor Novak
{"title":"Reading the Waves: Continuity and Change in Ocean Lawmaking","authors":"Gregor Novak","doi":"10.52214/cjel.v47i2.9874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nDuring the last several decades the ocean has maintained its histori- cally pivotal socio-economic and geopolitical role. Humans rely on the ocean for habitation and nourishment, energy and sanitation, migra- tion and refuge, trade and communication, knowledge and meaning- giving, and the maintenance of global peace and security. Yet many who depend on the ocean are poorly served by what may be called “ocean law.” Moreover, the ocean and its resources are under acute strain through overfishing, the varied consequences of climate change and ocean degradation, sea-level rise, and the risk of marine infectious dis- eases, among other threats. This Article identifies widely-recognized de- ficiencies in “ocean law,” traces them to the design of ocean lawmaking, and draws on the latter’s history to point towards a path of democratic reform. Navigators are skilled at “reading the waves,” distilling insights about past and likely future events from ripples on the ocean’s surface. Similarly, this Article samples from the modern history of humanity’s re- lationship with the ocean to gain insights into continuities, changes, and dynamic elements in contemporary ocean lawmaking. The Article ar- gues that keeping in mind, supporting, and leveraging certain dynamic elements revealed in this lawmaking arena can help democratize ocean lawmaking and accelerate sorely needed reforms in ocean law. Such reforms are needed because contemporary ocean lawmaking has pro- duced ocean law whose main defect is not merely that it is patchy, uncoordinated, and often ineffective but that it is heavily skewed to- wards powerful actors with vested interests in the status quo. As a re- sult, it has sidelined those who must bear the downstream costs of its lawmaking outcomes and placed at risk the very survival of the ocean ecosystem and those who rely on it. In turn, any reform of ocean law- making should give more power and voice to vulnerable coastal com- munities, victims of human trafficking, refugees, maritime workers, peo- ple deriving their livelihood from the marine economy, consumers, the scientific community, indigenous peoples, future generations, and the maritime ecosystem itself.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":246399,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Environmental Law","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v47i2.9874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last several decades the ocean has maintained its histori- cally pivotal socio-economic and geopolitical role. Humans rely on the ocean for habitation and nourishment, energy and sanitation, migra- tion and refuge, trade and communication, knowledge and meaning- giving, and the maintenance of global peace and security. Yet many who depend on the ocean are poorly served by what may be called “ocean law.” Moreover, the ocean and its resources are under acute strain through overfishing, the varied consequences of climate change and ocean degradation, sea-level rise, and the risk of marine infectious dis- eases, among other threats. This Article identifies widely-recognized de- ficiencies in “ocean law,” traces them to the design of ocean lawmaking, and draws on the latter’s history to point towards a path of democratic reform. Navigators are skilled at “reading the waves,” distilling insights about past and likely future events from ripples on the ocean’s surface. Similarly, this Article samples from the modern history of humanity’s re- lationship with the ocean to gain insights into continuities, changes, and dynamic elements in contemporary ocean lawmaking. The Article ar- gues that keeping in mind, supporting, and leveraging certain dynamic elements revealed in this lawmaking arena can help democratize ocean lawmaking and accelerate sorely needed reforms in ocean law. Such reforms are needed because contemporary ocean lawmaking has pro- duced ocean law whose main defect is not merely that it is patchy, uncoordinated, and often ineffective but that it is heavily skewed to- wards powerful actors with vested interests in the status quo. As a re- sult, it has sidelined those who must bear the downstream costs of its lawmaking outcomes and placed at risk the very survival of the ocean ecosystem and those who rely on it. In turn, any reform of ocean law- making should give more power and voice to vulnerable coastal com- munities, victims of human trafficking, refugees, maritime workers, peo- ple deriving their livelihood from the marine economy, consumers, the scientific community, indigenous peoples, future generations, and the maritime ecosystem itself.
解读海浪:海洋立法的延续与变化
在过去的几十年里,海洋一直保持着其历史上关键的社会经济和地缘政治作用。人类依靠海洋获得居住和营养、能源和卫生、迁徙和避难、贸易和交流、知识和意义,以及维护全球和平与安全。然而,许多依赖海洋的人却没有得到所谓的“海洋法律”的服务。此外,由于过度捕捞、气候变化和海洋退化的各种后果、海平面上升以及海洋传染病的风险等威胁,海洋及其资源正面临严峻的压力。本文指出了“海洋法”中普遍存在的缺陷,并将其追溯到海洋立法的设计,并借鉴后者的历史,指出了一条民主改革的道路。导航员擅长“读浪”,从海洋表面的涟漪中提炼出对过去和可能发生的未来事件的见解。同样,本文从人类与海洋关系的近代史中取样,以洞察当代海洋立法的连续性、变化和动态因素。本文认为,牢记、支持和利用这一立法舞台上所揭示的某些动态因素,有助于实现海洋立法的民主化,加快海洋法律急需的改革。这种改革是必要的,因为当代海洋立法所产生的海洋法律的主要缺陷不仅在于它不完整、不协调、往往无效,而且严重偏向于在现状中拥有既得利益的强大行为者。其结果是,它将那些必须承担其立法结果的下游成本的人排除在外,并将海洋生态系统的生存和依赖它的人置于危险之中。反过来,海洋立法的任何改革都应该给予脆弱的沿海社区、人口贩运的受害者、难民、海事工人、以海洋经济为生的人们、消费者、科学界、土著人民、后代和海洋生态系统本身更多的权力和发言权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信