Makna Pengalihan Hak Kepemilikan Benda Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dasar Kepercayaan

Rachmadi Usman
{"title":"Makna Pengalihan Hak Kepemilikan Benda Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dasar Kepercayaan","authors":"Rachmadi Usman","doi":"10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL28.ISS1.ART7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of fiduciary in legislation is “the transfer of ownership rights to an object on the basis of belief”, while jurisprudence defines it as “the transfer of property rights based on trust”. However, the object whose ownership rights have been transferred remains in the hands of the fiduciary. This fiduciary concept contains ambiguity, because in its imposition it is not clear how the transfer of property rights to the object of the fiduciary guarantee. The juridical and actual submission of movable objects generally occurs at the same time. The meaning of the transfer of ownership rights to objects of fiduciary security on the basis of this belief needs to be examined. This is a normative legal research using a statutory and historical approach. The results of the study conclude that the real and juridical submission of fiduciary security does not occur at the same time. The transfer of ownership rights to the object of fiduciary security is carried out as collateral for debt repayment, meaning false delivery, not really in the sense of the transfer of real ownership rights. The real delivery only occurs when the fiduciary is deemed in default, on the other hand the object of the fiduciary guarantee will be returned if the fiduciary is not in default. This transfer of ownership rights to the object of fiduciary security is intended to give the fiduciary the authority to act to sell the object of fiduciary security as well as to give preference to other creditors.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/IUSTUM.VOL28.ISS1.ART7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The concept of fiduciary in legislation is “the transfer of ownership rights to an object on the basis of belief”, while jurisprudence defines it as “the transfer of property rights based on trust”. However, the object whose ownership rights have been transferred remains in the hands of the fiduciary. This fiduciary concept contains ambiguity, because in its imposition it is not clear how the transfer of property rights to the object of the fiduciary guarantee. The juridical and actual submission of movable objects generally occurs at the same time. The meaning of the transfer of ownership rights to objects of fiduciary security on the basis of this belief needs to be examined. This is a normative legal research using a statutory and historical approach. The results of the study conclude that the real and juridical submission of fiduciary security does not occur at the same time. The transfer of ownership rights to the object of fiduciary security is carried out as collateral for debt repayment, meaning false delivery, not really in the sense of the transfer of real ownership rights. The real delivery only occurs when the fiduciary is deemed in default, on the other hand the object of the fiduciary guarantee will be returned if the fiduciary is not in default. This transfer of ownership rights to the object of fiduciary security is intended to give the fiduciary the authority to act to sell the object of fiduciary security as well as to give preference to other creditors.
在信任的基础上改变受托人的所有权
立法上的信义概念是“以信仰为基础将所有权转移给客体”,法学上则将其定义为“以信任为基础的产权转移”。但是,其所有权被转移的客体仍由受托人持有。这一信义概念具有模糊性,因为在强制实施时,不清楚如何将财产权转让给信义担保的对象。动产在法律上的提交和实际的提交通常是同时发生的。在这一信念的基础上,所有权向信义担保对象的转移的意义需要加以考察。这是一项运用成文法和历史方法的规范性法律研究。研究结果表明,信托担保的实际提交和法律提交并非同时发生。对信义担保对象的所有权转让是作为偿还债务的抵押品进行的,意味着虚假交付,而不是真正意义上的真实所有权转让。真实交付仅在被视为信义人违约时发生,而信义人未违约时,信义保证标的将被返还。将所有权转让给信托担保对象的目的是赋予受托人采取行动出售信托担保对象的权力,并给予其他债权人优先权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信