A methodology for the validation of image segmentation methods

C. D. Graaf, A. Koster, K. Vincken, M. Viergever
{"title":"A methodology for the validation of image segmentation methods","authors":"C. D. Graaf, A. Koster, K. Vincken, M. Viergever","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.1992.244967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A validation methodology for image segmentation methods is explored that is based on quality constrained cost analysis. In this methodology a segmentation method is evaluated by the cost reduction it provides relative to the cost of a full-interactive (manual) segmentation. This cost is constrained by a quality threshold, so that less-than-perfect segmentations are allowed. In this way, segmentation methods which are entirely different in nature can be compared objectively. The validation methodology is presented in its most general form, along with an example of its application to the comparison of segmentation methods.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":197891,"journal":{"name":"[1992] Proceedings Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1992] Proceedings Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.1992.244967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

A validation methodology for image segmentation methods is explored that is based on quality constrained cost analysis. In this methodology a segmentation method is evaluated by the cost reduction it provides relative to the cost of a full-interactive (manual) segmentation. This cost is constrained by a quality threshold, so that less-than-perfect segmentations are allowed. In this way, segmentation methods which are entirely different in nature can be compared objectively. The validation methodology is presented in its most general form, along with an example of its application to the comparison of segmentation methods.<>
一种验证图像分割方法的方法
探讨了一种基于质量约束成本分析的图像分割方法验证方法。在这种方法中,分割方法是通过相对于全交互式(手动)分割的成本降低来评估的。这种成本受到质量阈值的限制,因此不太完美的分割是允许的。这样就可以客观地比较性质完全不同的分割方法。验证方法以其最一般的形式呈现,以及其应用于分割方法比较的示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信