Can Competency Assessment Support Struggles for Community Development and Self-determination?

R. Flowers
{"title":"Can Competency Assessment Support Struggles for Community Development and Self-determination?","authors":"R. Flowers","doi":"10.3278/REP0902W023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper an argument is presented that if competency assessment is to make any contribution as a potentially “liberating” curriculum strategy for struggles of community development and self-determination then it needs to contest the authoritarianism of the national qualification frameworks that have been established in Australia and New Zealand. This article critiques research and policy efforts, in particular for indigenous learners which seek to merely make authoritarian curriculum and assessment structures more culturally appropriate, more accessible and equitable rather than changing and democratising the structures themselves.","PeriodicalId":326186,"journal":{"name":"REPORT - Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung 02/2009","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REPORT - Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung 02/2009","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3278/REP0902W023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this paper an argument is presented that if competency assessment is to make any contribution as a potentially “liberating” curriculum strategy for struggles of community development and self-determination then it needs to contest the authoritarianism of the national qualification frameworks that have been established in Australia and New Zealand. This article critiques research and policy efforts, in particular for indigenous learners which seek to merely make authoritarian curriculum and assessment structures more culturally appropriate, more accessible and equitable rather than changing and democratising the structures themselves.
能力评估能支持社区发展和自决的斗争吗?
本文提出了一个论点,即如果能力评估要作为一种潜在的“解放”课程策略,为社区发展和自决的斗争做出任何贡献,那么它需要挑战澳大利亚和新西兰建立的国家资格框架的威权主义。本文批评了研究和政策努力,特别是针对土著学习者的研究和政策努力,这些研究和政策努力只是试图使专制的课程和评估结构在文化上更合适、更容易获得和公平,而不是改变和民主化结构本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信