The Association Between Threatened Miscarriage And Development Of Gestational Hypertension/Pre-Eclampsia

S. Gunarathna, A. Nishad, L. Pallemulla, N. Rathnayaka, L. Rasanjana, P. K. Abeysundara
{"title":"The Association Between Threatened Miscarriage And Development Of Gestational Hypertension/Pre-Eclampsia","authors":"S. Gunarathna, A. Nishad, L. Pallemulla, N. Rathnayaka, L. Rasanjana, P. K. Abeysundara","doi":"10.1101/2021.05.07.21256696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Gestational hypertension (GH)/Pre-eclampsia (PEC) is an important cause of direct maternal deaths in Sri Lanka. GH/PEC and threatened miscarriage (TM) share common pathophysiological mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine the association between TM and development of GH/PEC. Methodology: A case control study was conducted at Castle Street Hospital for Women, Sri Lanka from April 2015 to October 2015. Cases consisted of patients with GH/PEC and compared with age and parity matched controls. A systematic random sampling method was used. Similar number of cases and controls were compared while each group consisted of 245 subjects. Data was obtained from medical records. It is also important to note that mothers aged 20-35 years were included and medical disorders other than GH/PEC was excluded. Results: There were 245 subjects in each group of the study. Among the cases, 56% had GH and the rest had PEC. There were 25 patients with TM in the study population and 64% of them subsequently developed GH or PEC. There is also a significant risk of developing PEC in a patient who had a history of threatened miscarriage (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.35-8.11). Moreover the patients who had a history of TM tend to develop GH or PEC early, within 20-32 weeks of gestation (OR 11.49, 95% CI 3.88-33.99). As we identified, 62% of patients who had TM developed GH/PEC early (from 20 to 32 weeks) but among the cases who had no history of TM, only 12% developed GH/PEC between 20 to 32 weeks of gestation (O.R. 20.7 (5.66 to 91.96). There is a significant risk of developing severe GH/PEC in the group of patients who had a history of TM (OR 8.59, 95% CI 2.87- 25.66). Eighty one percent (81%) of the cases, who had a history of TM, developed severe and moderate GH/PEC rather than mild. But the majority (63%) of the cases, who had no history of TM, developed mild GH/PEC (O.R. 7.6 (2.00 to 42.55).","PeriodicalId":186118,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.07.21256696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Gestational hypertension (GH)/Pre-eclampsia (PEC) is an important cause of direct maternal deaths in Sri Lanka. GH/PEC and threatened miscarriage (TM) share common pathophysiological mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine the association between TM and development of GH/PEC. Methodology: A case control study was conducted at Castle Street Hospital for Women, Sri Lanka from April 2015 to October 2015. Cases consisted of patients with GH/PEC and compared with age and parity matched controls. A systematic random sampling method was used. Similar number of cases and controls were compared while each group consisted of 245 subjects. Data was obtained from medical records. It is also important to note that mothers aged 20-35 years were included and medical disorders other than GH/PEC was excluded. Results: There were 245 subjects in each group of the study. Among the cases, 56% had GH and the rest had PEC. There were 25 patients with TM in the study population and 64% of them subsequently developed GH or PEC. There is also a significant risk of developing PEC in a patient who had a history of threatened miscarriage (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.35-8.11). Moreover the patients who had a history of TM tend to develop GH or PEC early, within 20-32 weeks of gestation (OR 11.49, 95% CI 3.88-33.99). As we identified, 62% of patients who had TM developed GH/PEC early (from 20 to 32 weeks) but among the cases who had no history of TM, only 12% developed GH/PEC between 20 to 32 weeks of gestation (O.R. 20.7 (5.66 to 91.96). There is a significant risk of developing severe GH/PEC in the group of patients who had a history of TM (OR 8.59, 95% CI 2.87- 25.66). Eighty one percent (81%) of the cases, who had a history of TM, developed severe and moderate GH/PEC rather than mild. But the majority (63%) of the cases, who had no history of TM, developed mild GH/PEC (O.R. 7.6 (2.00 to 42.55).
先兆流产与妊娠期高血压/先兆子痫发展的关系
妊娠期高血压(GH)/先兆子痫(PEC)是斯里兰卡孕产妇直接死亡的一个重要原因。GH/PEC与先兆流产(TM)具有共同的病理生理机制。本研究旨在确定TM与GH/PEC发展之间的关系。方法:2015年4月至2015年10月在斯里兰卡城堡街妇女医院进行了一项病例对照研究。病例包括GH/PEC患者,并与年龄和胎次匹配的对照组进行比较。采用系统随机抽样方法。每组由245名受试者组成,比较了相似数量的病例和对照组。数据来自医疗记录。同样重要的是要指出,年龄在20-35岁之间的母亲被包括在内,除GH/PEC以外的疾病被排除在外。结果:两组共245名受试者。其中56%为GH,其余为PEC。研究人群中有25例TM患者,其中64%的患者随后发展为GH或PEC。有先兆流产史的患者也有发生PEC的显著风险(OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.35-8.11)。此外,有TM病史的患者更容易在妊娠20 ~ 32周内出现GH或PEC (or 11.49, 95% CI 3.88 ~ 33.99)。我们发现,62%的TM患者在妊娠早期(20 - 32周)发生GH/PEC,而在没有TM病史的患者中,只有12%的患者在妊娠20 - 32周发生GH/PEC (O.R. 20.7(5.66 - 91.96))。有TM病史的患者发生严重GH/PEC的风险显著(OR 8.59, 95% CI 2.87- 25.66)。81%有TM病史的患者发展为重度和中度GH/PEC,而不是轻度。但大多数(63%)无TM病史的患者发展为轻度GH/PEC (O.R. 7.6(2.00 ~ 42.55))。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信