Node Fragility versus Link Fragility for Route Selection in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

I. S. Ismail
{"title":"Node Fragility versus Link Fragility for Route Selection in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks","authors":"I. S. Ismail","doi":"10.1142/S0219799506000399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mobile ad-hoc network is a dynamically changing network of mobile devices that communicate without the support of a fixed structure. There is a direct communication among the neighboring devices, but non-neighboring devices requires a robust and intelligent routing strategy to ensure reliable and efficient communication. The performance of routing protocols depends on the quality of the routes chosen in terms of route longevity. A protocol that discovers better routes also features a reduced rate of route failures and lesser route discovery traffic. Thus an important aspect of the decision process is to compare and pick the more stable route. A Route Fragility Coefficient (RFC) metric was used to estimate routes' stability. In this paper, the link fragility metric is used to create a new metric called Node Fragility Coefficient (NFC) that is also used to estimate routes' stability. Comparing routing protocols using RFC and NFC metrics to select the more stable routes, simulation results prove that using NFC is much better, it leads to better throughput, average packet's delay, average number of hops/ packet, average consumed power/ packet, percentage number of route changes and percentage number of undelivered packets.","PeriodicalId":185917,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Wirel. Opt. Commun.","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Wirel. Opt. Commun.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219799506000399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A mobile ad-hoc network is a dynamically changing network of mobile devices that communicate without the support of a fixed structure. There is a direct communication among the neighboring devices, but non-neighboring devices requires a robust and intelligent routing strategy to ensure reliable and efficient communication. The performance of routing protocols depends on the quality of the routes chosen in terms of route longevity. A protocol that discovers better routes also features a reduced rate of route failures and lesser route discovery traffic. Thus an important aspect of the decision process is to compare and pick the more stable route. A Route Fragility Coefficient (RFC) metric was used to estimate routes' stability. In this paper, the link fragility metric is used to create a new metric called Node Fragility Coefficient (NFC) that is also used to estimate routes' stability. Comparing routing protocols using RFC and NFC metrics to select the more stable routes, simulation results prove that using NFC is much better, it leads to better throughput, average packet's delay, average number of hops/ packet, average consumed power/ packet, percentage number of route changes and percentage number of undelivered packets.
移动自组织网络中节点脆弱性与链路脆弱性的路由选择
移动自组织网络是一种动态变化的移动设备网络,在没有固定结构支持的情况下进行通信。相邻设备之间可以直接通信,而非相邻设备之间则需要鲁棒智能的路由策略来保证通信的可靠和高效。路由协议的性能取决于所选路由的质量,即路由的寿命。发现更好的路由的协议还具有更低的路由失败率和更少的路由发现流量。因此,决策过程的一个重要方面是比较和选择更稳定的路线。采用路由脆弱性系数(Route vulnerability Coefficient, RFC)度量来评价路由的稳定性。在本文中,使用链路脆弱性度量来创建一个称为节点脆弱性系数(NFC)的新度量,该度量也用于估计路由的稳定性。通过对比RFC和NFC两种路由协议来选择更稳定的路由,仿真结果表明,NFC在吞吐量、平均数据包延迟、平均跳数/数据包、平均消耗功率/数据包、路由变化百分比和未发送数据包百分比等方面都优于RFC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信