Adaptation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people self-identification scale (DIDS)

N. Mikhailova, Anastasia Krasko, Margarita Fattakhova, Margarita Mironova, Ekaterina Vyacheslavova
{"title":"Adaptation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people self-identification scale (DIDS)","authors":"N. Mikhailova, Anastasia Krasko, Margarita Fattakhova, Margarita Mironova, Ekaterina Vyacheslavova","doi":"10.21638/spbu16.2022.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One obstacle in understanding deafness as a cultural difference is the absence of models and methods that could study the acculturation or identity of deaf people in modern Russia. Approbation and validation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people self-identification scale (DIDS), based on the Glickman model of the development of cultural identity, could contribute to the study of acculturation of deaf people in Russia, and create a reliable methodological tool for practical psychologists working in the system of special secondary and higher professional education. The purpose of this article is to present materials of the step-by-step psychometric verification of the DIDS questionnaire, obtained on a sample of deaf and hard of hearing students studying in different institutional settings, aged 17 to 41 (N = 420, M = 21.88; SD = 5.24). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that all scales are independent of each other. To check the consistency of the scales, the Cronbach coefficient was used. It demonstrated high consistency of each scale in the general sample (α-Cronbach from 0.704 to 0.767), as well as on subsamples of men and women (α-Cronbach from 0.629 to 0.801) and in different age groups (α-Cronbach from 0.687 to 0.862). To check the stability of the scales, an analysis was also carried out on subsamples of persons with varying degrees of hearing loss (α-Cronbach from 0.653 to 0.832) and without it (α-Cronbach from 0.688 to 0.801). To check the internal consistency of the questionnaire, a correlation analysis was carried out both within the scales and between them. The results obtained confirmed the conformity of the considered construct. As a result, the Russian adaptation of the American DIDS scale was reduced by 20 statements, which increased the internal consistency and reliability of the methodology. Analysis of the psychometric properties of the DIDS scale confirmed the possibility of its usage in deaf and hard of hearing Russians.","PeriodicalId":388528,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One obstacle in understanding deafness as a cultural difference is the absence of models and methods that could study the acculturation or identity of deaf people in modern Russia. Approbation and validation of deaf and hard-of-hearing people self-identification scale (DIDS), based on the Glickman model of the development of cultural identity, could contribute to the study of acculturation of deaf people in Russia, and create a reliable methodological tool for practical psychologists working in the system of special secondary and higher professional education. The purpose of this article is to present materials of the step-by-step psychometric verification of the DIDS questionnaire, obtained on a sample of deaf and hard of hearing students studying in different institutional settings, aged 17 to 41 (N = 420, M = 21.88; SD = 5.24). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that all scales are independent of each other. To check the consistency of the scales, the Cronbach coefficient was used. It demonstrated high consistency of each scale in the general sample (α-Cronbach from 0.704 to 0.767), as well as on subsamples of men and women (α-Cronbach from 0.629 to 0.801) and in different age groups (α-Cronbach from 0.687 to 0.862). To check the stability of the scales, an analysis was also carried out on subsamples of persons with varying degrees of hearing loss (α-Cronbach from 0.653 to 0.832) and without it (α-Cronbach from 0.688 to 0.801). To check the internal consistency of the questionnaire, a correlation analysis was carried out both within the scales and between them. The results obtained confirmed the conformity of the considered construct. As a result, the Russian adaptation of the American DIDS scale was reduced by 20 statements, which increased the internal consistency and reliability of the methodology. Analysis of the psychometric properties of the DIDS scale confirmed the possibility of its usage in deaf and hard of hearing Russians.
聋人、重听人自我认同量表(DIDS)
将耳聋作为一种文化差异来理解的一个障碍是,缺乏研究现代俄罗斯聋人文化适应或身份认同的模型和方法。基于Glickman文化认同发展模型的聋人和听障人士自我认同量表(DIDS)的认可与验证,有助于对俄罗斯聋人文化适应的研究,并为从事特殊中等和高等职业教育系统的实践心理学家提供可靠的方法论工具。本文的目的是提供对DIDS问卷的分步心理测量验证材料,该问卷以17 ~ 41岁在不同机构环境中学习的聋哑和重听学生为样本(N = 420, M = 21.88;Sd = 5.24)。验证性因子分析(CFA)表明,各量表相互独立。为检验量表的一致性,采用Cronbach系数。各量表在一般样本(α-Cronbach在0.704 ~ 0.767之间)、男女子样本(α-Cronbach在0.629 ~ 0.801之间)和不同年龄组(α-Cronbach在0.687 ~ 0.862之间)具有较高的一致性。为了检验量表的稳定性,还对不同程度听力损失者(α-Cronbach从0.653到0.832)和无听力损失者(α-Cronbach从0.688到0.801)的子样本进行了分析。为了检验问卷的内部一致性,我们在量表内和量表之间进行了相关分析。得到的结果证实了所考虑的结构的一致性。结果,俄罗斯对美国did比额表的调整减少了20项,这增加了该方法的内部一致性和可靠性。对DIDS量表的心理测量特性进行分析,证实了该量表在俄罗斯聋人、重听人群中应用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信