Bond Strength Comparison of Orthodontic Bonding Systems: A Systematic Review

Tubayesha Hassan, M. Sattar
{"title":"Bond Strength Comparison of Orthodontic Bonding Systems: A Systematic Review","authors":"Tubayesha Hassan, M. Sattar","doi":"10.3329/bjodfo.v7i1.43691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a means of regular practice in orthodontics and aesthetic dentistry, resin based adhesive systems are being used exclusively. Keeping up with the ever-increasing demand for aesthetic dental treatment all over the world, newer and more improved adhesive systems have been developed. However, regarding the comparison as to which bonding system performs better in clinical perspective, there is lack of existing scientific review articles. In this review, we tend to explore the conventional etch and rinse bonding system and the self-etch primer bonding system. The different tests to assess and compare bond strength between these two types of adhesives from various bibliography are discussed. The results of shear bond strength test, adhesive remnant index (ARI), enamel-adhesive interface using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the effect of saliva contamination and time are discussed. Interestingly, each system has its strengths and weaknesses. In shear bond strength, self-etch bonding systems clearly exhibits less strength than conventional bonding systems. Resin tags into enamel surface are shorter in self-etch primer adhesives which results from milder etching to enamel compared to the conventional aid-etch and rinse adhesives. Contrarily, the irreversible changes to enamel surface is more aggressive in conventional acid-etching which states that self-etching systems are better according to the principles of minimal intervention dentistry. \nBan J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2017; Vol-7 (1-2), P.20-26","PeriodicalId":177450,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjodfo.v7i1.43691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a means of regular practice in orthodontics and aesthetic dentistry, resin based adhesive systems are being used exclusively. Keeping up with the ever-increasing demand for aesthetic dental treatment all over the world, newer and more improved adhesive systems have been developed. However, regarding the comparison as to which bonding system performs better in clinical perspective, there is lack of existing scientific review articles. In this review, we tend to explore the conventional etch and rinse bonding system and the self-etch primer bonding system. The different tests to assess and compare bond strength between these two types of adhesives from various bibliography are discussed. The results of shear bond strength test, adhesive remnant index (ARI), enamel-adhesive interface using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the effect of saliva contamination and time are discussed. Interestingly, each system has its strengths and weaknesses. In shear bond strength, self-etch bonding systems clearly exhibits less strength than conventional bonding systems. Resin tags into enamel surface are shorter in self-etch primer adhesives which results from milder etching to enamel compared to the conventional aid-etch and rinse adhesives. Contrarily, the irreversible changes to enamel surface is more aggressive in conventional acid-etching which states that self-etching systems are better according to the principles of minimal intervention dentistry. Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2017; Vol-7 (1-2), P.20-26
正畸粘接系统的粘接强度比较
作为正畸和牙科美容的常规实践手段,树脂基粘接剂系统被专门使用。随着世界各地对牙科美容治疗的需求不断增长,更新和改进的粘接系统已经开发出来。然而,从临床角度比较哪一种粘接系统表现更好,缺乏现有的科学综述文章。在这篇综述中,我们倾向于探索传统的蚀刻和冲洗粘合系统和自蚀刻底漆粘合系统。讨论了不同的测试来评估和比较这两种类型的胶粘剂之间的粘结强度。讨论了剪切粘接强度测试、粘接残余指数(ARI)、扫描电镜(SEM)结果以及唾液污染和时间的影响。有趣的是,每个系统都有其优点和缺点。在剪切粘接强度方面,自蚀刻粘接系统明显表现出比传统粘接系统更低的强度。与传统的辅助蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂相比,自蚀刻底漆粘合剂对搪瓷表面的腐蚀较温和,因此树脂标签进入搪瓷表面的时间较短。与之相反,传统酸蚀法对牙釉质表面的不可逆变化更剧烈,这说明根据最小干预牙科的原则,自腐蚀系统更好。Ban J Orthod & dentoface Orthop, 2017年4月;第7卷(1-2),P.20-26
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信