Evaluation of end-to-end CNN models for palm vein recognition

J. Santamaría, R. Hernández-García, R. J. Barrientos, F. M. Castro, J. R. Cózar, Nicolás Guil Mata
{"title":"Evaluation of end-to-end CNN models for palm vein recognition","authors":"J. Santamaría, R. Hernández-García, R. J. Barrientos, F. M. Castro, J. R. Cózar, Nicolás Guil Mata","doi":"10.1109/SCCC54552.2021.9650384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, biometric systems have positioned themselves among the most widely used technologies for people recognition. In this context, palm vein patterns have received the attention of researchers due to their uniqueness, non-intrusion, and reliability. Currently, research on palm vein recognition based on deep learning is still very preliminary, most of the works are based on very deep models by using pre-trained models and transfer learning techniques. In this work, we evaluate end-to-end CNN models for palm vein recognition. The proposed method was implemented on seven public databases of palm vein images and two convolutional neural network architectures were evaluated: SingleNet, the proposed architecture of few convolutional layers, and a deeper architecture based on ResNet32. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the SingleNet model, outperforming the state-of-the-art results for the IITI, PUT, and FYO databases, achieving the same results on the Tongji and PolyU datasets, and obtaining a slightly lower performance for the VERA and CASIA databases. Comparing to the state-of-theart approaches, our proposed method is computationally simpler than those that are based on very deep architectures and others that fuse hand-crafted and CNN extracted features.","PeriodicalId":203286,"journal":{"name":"2021 40th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 40th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC54552.2021.9650384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In recent years, biometric systems have positioned themselves among the most widely used technologies for people recognition. In this context, palm vein patterns have received the attention of researchers due to their uniqueness, non-intrusion, and reliability. Currently, research on palm vein recognition based on deep learning is still very preliminary, most of the works are based on very deep models by using pre-trained models and transfer learning techniques. In this work, we evaluate end-to-end CNN models for palm vein recognition. The proposed method was implemented on seven public databases of palm vein images and two convolutional neural network architectures were evaluated: SingleNet, the proposed architecture of few convolutional layers, and a deeper architecture based on ResNet32. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the SingleNet model, outperforming the state-of-the-art results for the IITI, PUT, and FYO databases, achieving the same results on the Tongji and PolyU datasets, and obtaining a slightly lower performance for the VERA and CASIA databases. Comparing to the state-of-theart approaches, our proposed method is computationally simpler than those that are based on very deep architectures and others that fuse hand-crafted and CNN extracted features.
端到端CNN掌纹识别模型的评价
近年来,生物识别系统已成为应用最广泛的人脸识别技术之一。在此背景下,手掌静脉模式因其独特性、非侵入性和可靠性而受到研究人员的关注。目前,基于深度学习的掌纹识别研究还处于非常初级的阶段,大部分工作都是基于非常深的模型,使用预训练模型和迁移学习技术。在这项工作中,我们评估了端到端CNN模型用于手掌静脉识别。在7个公开的手掌静脉图像数据库上实现了该方法,并对两种卷积神经网络架构进行了评估:SingleNet,提出的少卷积层架构和基于ResNet32的更深层次架构。实验结果证明了SingleNet模型的优越性,优于IITI、PUT和FYO数据库的最新结果,在同济和理大数据集上取得了相同的结果,而在VERA和CASIA数据库上取得了稍低的性能。与最先进的方法相比,我们提出的方法在计算上比那些基于非常深的架构和其他融合手工制作和CNN提取特征的方法更简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信