{"title":"Seeing Ecophobia on a Vegan Plate","authors":"S. Estok","doi":"10.37536/ecozona.2020.11.2.3503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a sudden growth in the vegan industry, with meatless burgers garnering a profoundly positive consumer response and even people such as Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jackie Chan supportively entering the conversation. In some ways, companies such as Beyond MeatTM and Impossible FoodsTM and films such as The Game Changers are succeeding in doing what many political vegetarians and vegans, academics, and activists have long failed to do: to have a real effect on the animal agriculture business. Perhaps this is something to celebrate, especially since (despite the arguments, protests, and even veg-friendly businesses having steadily increased) the numbers of animals involved in the industry have consistently swollen. To rest much hope in the current vegan trends would be to fall victim to a deceptively sexist and ecophobic guiding narrative. While taking big steps toward shutting down the animal agriculture business, the great strides of the vegan industry follow a well-worn path. Putting veggie patties in the meat aisle and shunning words such as “vegetarian” and “vegan” engages in a disavowal of vegetal realities, and the fact that the meat aisle itself is so heavily gendered effectively re-genders the food itself. It may all seem harmless enough—even productive—until understood within the larger context of patriarchal “attempts,” to cite Laura Wright, “to reconceptualize veganism as an alternative untramasculine choice.” The Game Changers drips with such attempts, and, like the “meatless” products now enjoying such popularity, reeks of male self-delusionalism about having discovered a healthful, new diet. There is a lot more than veggies being served up with what we might call the new veganism, and there is not much chance of really effecting change unless we look at what’s really on the plate.","PeriodicalId":222311,"journal":{"name":"European journal of literature, culture and the environment","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of literature, culture and the environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37536/ecozona.2020.11.2.3503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There has been a sudden growth in the vegan industry, with meatless burgers garnering a profoundly positive consumer response and even people such as Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jackie Chan supportively entering the conversation. In some ways, companies such as Beyond MeatTM and Impossible FoodsTM and films such as The Game Changers are succeeding in doing what many political vegetarians and vegans, academics, and activists have long failed to do: to have a real effect on the animal agriculture business. Perhaps this is something to celebrate, especially since (despite the arguments, protests, and even veg-friendly businesses having steadily increased) the numbers of animals involved in the industry have consistently swollen. To rest much hope in the current vegan trends would be to fall victim to a deceptively sexist and ecophobic guiding narrative. While taking big steps toward shutting down the animal agriculture business, the great strides of the vegan industry follow a well-worn path. Putting veggie patties in the meat aisle and shunning words such as “vegetarian” and “vegan” engages in a disavowal of vegetal realities, and the fact that the meat aisle itself is so heavily gendered effectively re-genders the food itself. It may all seem harmless enough—even productive—until understood within the larger context of patriarchal “attempts,” to cite Laura Wright, “to reconceptualize veganism as an alternative untramasculine choice.” The Game Changers drips with such attempts, and, like the “meatless” products now enjoying such popularity, reeks of male self-delusionalism about having discovered a healthful, new diet. There is a lot more than veggies being served up with what we might call the new veganism, and there is not much chance of really effecting change unless we look at what’s really on the plate.
素食产业突然增长,无肉汉堡获得了非常积极的消费者反应,甚至像阿诺德·施瓦辛格和成龙这样的人也加入了对话。在某些方面,像Beyond MeatTM和Impossible FoodsTM这样的公司,以及像The Game Changers这样的电影,成功地做到了许多政治素食主义者、纯素食主义者、学者和活动家长期未能做到的事情:对畜牧业产生真正的影响。也许这是一件值得庆祝的事情,尤其是因为(尽管争论、抗议,甚至素食企业都在稳步增长)该行业涉及的动物数量一直在增加。对当前的纯素趋势抱有太多希望,将会成为欺骗性的性别歧视和生态恐惧症指导叙事的受害者。虽然在关闭动物农业方面迈出了一大步,但素食行业的大踏步走的是一条老路。把素食派放在肉类货架上,避免使用“素食主义者”和“纯素食主义者”这样的词,这是对素食现实的否认,而肉类货架本身如此严重的性别化,实际上是对食物本身进行了重新性别化。这一切似乎都是无害的,甚至是有益的,直到在父权“企图”的更大背景下被理解,引用劳拉·赖特的话,“将素食主义重新定义为一种非男性化的选择。”《游戏改变者》充斥着这样的尝试,就像现在大受欢迎的“无肉”产品一样,散发着男性自我错觉的味道,以为自己发现了一种健康的新饮食。我们可以称之为新素食主义的不仅仅是蔬菜,除非我们看看盘子里到底有什么,否则真正影响改变的机会并不大。