Lelang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Sinyal Telekomunikasi Dari Stasiun Araskabu Menuju Bandara Kualanamu Oleh Executive Vice President Pt. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) dengan Bajatra (Analisis Putusan Nomor 181 Pk/Tun/2016)
{"title":"Lelang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Sinyal Telekomunikasi Dari Stasiun Araskabu Menuju Bandara Kualanamu Oleh Executive Vice President Pt. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) dengan Bajatra (Analisis Putusan Nomor 181 Pk/Tun/2016)","authors":"Alam Syah Putra","doi":"10.35447/jph.v3i1.468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The user party is the party who requests or assigns the provider a task to supply or manufacture goods or make certain jobs. The problem in this research is the legal regulation of the auction of the procurement of goods and services in government regulations. Sanctions that can be imposed on parties related to the procurement of government goods/services that do not meet the requirements of the provisions of the work order. How is the judge's legal considerations in deciding the dispute between PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) with Bajatra in Decision Number 181 PK/TUN/2016. This research uses normative legal research methods. Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning the Procurement of Government Goods/Services provides guidelines for regulating and implementing the procurement of goods/services that accommodates the development of government needs regarding the regulation of the procurement of goods/services in order to fulfill the maximum benefit value and be able to contribute in increasing the use of products. domestic. Sanctions that can be imposed on parties related to the procurement of government goods/services that do not meet the requirements of the provisions of the work order. The sanctions are regulated in Article 83 of Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018, one of which is in the form of sanctions for inclusion in the Black List. The judge's legal considerations in deciding the dispute between PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) With PT. Bajatra in Decision Number 181 PK/TUN/2016 is a test of the validity of both procedural and substantial terms of the imposition of a blacklist addressed to the Plaintiff issued by the Defendant, not regarding the provision of goods and services in terms of telecommunication signal work from Araskabu station to Medan Kualanamu Airport. and Sepur 8, 9 Medan Station Emplacement. Implementation of the work agreement between PT. Bajatra and PT. KAI.","PeriodicalId":302535,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Perspektif Hukum","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Perspektif Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v3i1.468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The user party is the party who requests or assigns the provider a task to supply or manufacture goods or make certain jobs. The problem in this research is the legal regulation of the auction of the procurement of goods and services in government regulations. Sanctions that can be imposed on parties related to the procurement of government goods/services that do not meet the requirements of the provisions of the work order. How is the judge's legal considerations in deciding the dispute between PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) with Bajatra in Decision Number 181 PK/TUN/2016. This research uses normative legal research methods. Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 concerning the Procurement of Government Goods/Services provides guidelines for regulating and implementing the procurement of goods/services that accommodates the development of government needs regarding the regulation of the procurement of goods/services in order to fulfill the maximum benefit value and be able to contribute in increasing the use of products. domestic. Sanctions that can be imposed on parties related to the procurement of government goods/services that do not meet the requirements of the provisions of the work order. The sanctions are regulated in Article 83 of Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018, one of which is in the form of sanctions for inclusion in the Black List. The judge's legal considerations in deciding the dispute between PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero) With PT. Bajatra in Decision Number 181 PK/TUN/2016 is a test of the validity of both procedural and substantial terms of the imposition of a blacklist addressed to the Plaintiff issued by the Defendant, not regarding the provision of goods and services in terms of telecommunication signal work from Araskabu station to Medan Kualanamu Airport. and Sepur 8, 9 Medan Station Emplacement. Implementation of the work agreement between PT. Bajatra and PT. KAI.
从阿拉斯卡布车站到kualbu机场的电信服务拍卖会由Pt. Indonesia razzra的执行总裁总裁潘克特拉(分析编号181 Pk/Tun/2016)
用户方是要求或分配给提供商一项任务以供应或制造商品或进行某些工作的一方。本文研究的问题是政府法规中对商品和服务采购拍卖的法律规制。可对与采购不符合工作订单规定的政府货物/服务有关的各方实施的制裁。在第181号PK/TUN/2016号判决书中,法官在裁决PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero)与Bajatra之间的纠纷时的法律考虑是什么?本研究采用规范的法学研究方法。关于政府货物/服务采购的2018年第16号总统条例提供了规范和实施货物/服务采购的指南,以适应政府在货物/服务采购监管方面的发展需求,以实现最大的利益价值,并能够为增加产品的使用做出贡献。国内。可对与采购不符合工作订单规定的政府货物/服务有关的各方实施的制裁。这些制裁是根据2018年第16号总统令第83条规定的,其中一条是以列入黑名单的制裁形式进行的。在第181号PK/TUN/2016号判决中,法官在裁决PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero)与PT. Bajatra之间的纠纷时,考虑的法律因素是对被告向原告发布黑名单的程序和实质性条款的有效性进行测试,而不是针对从阿拉斯卡布站到棉兰瓜兰纳木机场的电信信号工作提供的商品和服务。和Sepur 8、9棉兰车站炮台。执行Bajatra公司与KAI公司之间的工作协议。