Comparing Between Chinese College Entrance Examination and UCAS by Using Market Design Theory

Zhentu Liu
{"title":"Comparing Between Chinese College Entrance Examination and UCAS by Using Market Design Theory","authors":"Zhentu Liu","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.211209.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The diverse admission between China and the UK is increasingly being compared and disputed, which is worth for both sides to learn from each other. This paper compares the admission mechanism between the Chinese College Entrance Examination and the University and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) relying on the concept of ‘market design theory’. The author will use some investigation methods and observational methods base on the data of participants in 2021 to analyze the current matching system, which will subsequently explore if the systems are stable, Pareto efficient, and Strategy-proof. Eventually, the author’s enlightenment and suggestions will be put forward.","PeriodicalId":322864,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211209.073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diverse admission between China and the UK is increasingly being compared and disputed, which is worth for both sides to learn from each other. This paper compares the admission mechanism between the Chinese College Entrance Examination and the University and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS) relying on the concept of ‘market design theory’. The author will use some investigation methods and observational methods base on the data of participants in 2021 to analyze the current matching system, which will subsequently explore if the systems are stable, Pareto efficient, and Strategy-proof. Eventually, the author’s enlightenment and suggestions will be put forward.
用市场设计理论比较中国高考与中国大学入学申请
中英两国的多元录取越来越多地被比较和争议,值得双方相互借鉴。本文运用“市场设计理论”的概念,对中国高考和高校招生服务机构的招生机制进行了比较。作者将在2021年使用一些基于参与者数据的调查方法和观察方法来分析当前的匹配系统,从而探索系统是否稳定,帕累托效率和策略证明。最后,提出笔者的启示和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信