The Severability of Dual-Purpose Leases in the Appalachia

Brian M. Lucot, Jeff M. Stacko
{"title":"The Severability of Dual-Purpose Leases in the Appalachia","authors":"Brian M. Lucot, Jeff M. Stacko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2703565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oil and gas leases have undergone frequent evolution since the Drake Well sparked the first oil boom in the United States. One development evidencing this evolution is the creation of the dual-purpose oil and gas lease. In the years following the Drake Well, many leases only granted lessees the right to produce oil and gas. These leases would extend beyond their primary term only for so long as oil and gas were produced from leased premises, and would terminate after a certain period of non-production per the terms of the contract. As geological formations containing oil and gas in the Appalachian states became depleted in the 1930s and 1940s, it became necessary to pipe in gas from out-of-state to stockpile for the winter months. The inadequacy of pipeline infrastructure at the time necessitated that foreign gas be stored in geological formations depleted of their own gas. As such, lessees sought to amend existing leases as well as enter into new leases granting them not only the right to produce oil and gas, but also the right to store and to protect stored oil and gas. According to their express terms, these leases would extend beyond their primary term for so long as said lands were producing oil and gas, or being used for the storage or the protection of stored oil and gas. These leases allowing for production, storage and protection of storage are known as dual-purpose leases. Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia courts have recently addressed challenges from lessors asserting that production provisions of dual-purpose leases expire following the primary term if the leases are extended into their secondary term only by virtue of storage, and not production. Lessors contend that the production and storage provisions in dual-purpose leases are severable. Courts in Pennsylvania and Ohio have examined some dual-purpose leases and determined that these lease provisions are generally entire, not severable; thus, lessees properly storing and making storage rental payments under such leases retain all of the rights under the lease, including the right to production. A Federal District Court for West Virginia reached the opposite conclusion. This article examines how courts in the Appalachian region have ruled on the issue of severability and also the factors the courts have considered in reaching their conclusions.","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2703565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil and gas leases have undergone frequent evolution since the Drake Well sparked the first oil boom in the United States. One development evidencing this evolution is the creation of the dual-purpose oil and gas lease. In the years following the Drake Well, many leases only granted lessees the right to produce oil and gas. These leases would extend beyond their primary term only for so long as oil and gas were produced from leased premises, and would terminate after a certain period of non-production per the terms of the contract. As geological formations containing oil and gas in the Appalachian states became depleted in the 1930s and 1940s, it became necessary to pipe in gas from out-of-state to stockpile for the winter months. The inadequacy of pipeline infrastructure at the time necessitated that foreign gas be stored in geological formations depleted of their own gas. As such, lessees sought to amend existing leases as well as enter into new leases granting them not only the right to produce oil and gas, but also the right to store and to protect stored oil and gas. According to their express terms, these leases would extend beyond their primary term for so long as said lands were producing oil and gas, or being used for the storage or the protection of stored oil and gas. These leases allowing for production, storage and protection of storage are known as dual-purpose leases. Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia courts have recently addressed challenges from lessors asserting that production provisions of dual-purpose leases expire following the primary term if the leases are extended into their secondary term only by virtue of storage, and not production. Lessors contend that the production and storage provisions in dual-purpose leases are severable. Courts in Pennsylvania and Ohio have examined some dual-purpose leases and determined that these lease provisions are generally entire, not severable; thus, lessees properly storing and making storage rental payments under such leases retain all of the rights under the lease, including the right to production. A Federal District Court for West Virginia reached the opposite conclusion. This article examines how courts in the Appalachian region have ruled on the issue of severability and also the factors the courts have considered in reaching their conclusions.
阿巴拉契亚地区双重用途租赁的可分割性
自德雷克油井引发美国第一次石油繁荣以来,石油和天然气租赁经历了频繁的演变。证明这种演变的一个发展是双重用途石油和天然气租赁的创建。在德雷克井之后的几年里,许多租约只授予承租人生产石油和天然气的权利。这些租约只有在从租赁场所生产石油和天然气的情况下才会延长,并在根据合同条款规定的一段时间不生产后终止。20世纪30年代和40年代,由于阿巴拉契亚州含有石油和天然气的地质构造逐渐枯竭,有必要从州外用管道输送天然气,以储存冬季所需的天然气。由于当时管道基础设施不足,外国天然气必须储存在本国天然气枯竭的地质构造中。因此,承租人试图修改现有租约,并签订新的租约,不仅赋予他们生产石油和天然气的权利,还赋予他们储存和保护储存石油和天然气的权利。根据他们的明确条款,只要这些土地还在生产石油和天然气,或被用于储存或保护储存的石油和天然气,这些租约就会延长到最初的期限之后。这些允许生产、储存和保护储存的租赁被称为双重用途租赁。宾夕法尼亚州、俄亥俄州和西弗吉尼亚州的法院最近解决了出租人提出的挑战,出租人声称,如果租赁仅因储存而非生产而延长至第二期限,则双重用途租赁的生产条款将在第一期限后到期。出租人认为,双重用途租赁中的生产和储存条款是可分割的。宾夕法尼亚州和俄亥俄州的法院审查了一些双重用途租赁,并确定这些租赁条款通常是完整的,不可分割的;因此,承租人在这种租约下妥善储存和支付储存租金,保留租约下的所有权利,包括生产权利。西弗吉尼亚州联邦地方法院得出了相反的结论。本文考察了阿巴拉契亚地区的法院是如何就可分割性问题作出裁决的,以及法院在得出结论时所考虑的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信