Android Permission Manager, Visual Cues, and their Effect on Privacy Awareness and Privacy Literacy

Vera Schmitt, Maija Poikela, Sebastian Möller
{"title":"Android Permission Manager, Visual Cues, and their Effect on Privacy Awareness and Privacy Literacy","authors":"Vera Schmitt, Maija Poikela, Sebastian Möller","doi":"10.1145/3538969.3543790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Android applications request specific permissions from users during the installations to perform required functionalities by accessing system resources and personal information. Usually, users must approve the permissions requested by applications (apps) during the installation process and before the apps can collect privacy- or security-relevant information. However, recent studies have shown that users are overwhelmed with the information provided in privacy policies and do not understand permission requests and which functionalities are necessary for certain applications. Hereby, the collection of personal information remains mostly hidden, as the task of verifying to which information different apps have access to can be very complicated. Therefore, it is necessary to develop frameworks and apps that enable the user to perform informed decisions about apps’ run-time permission access to facilitate the control over sensitive information collected by various apps on smartphones. In this work, we conducted an online study with 70 participants who interacted with a mockup app that enables advanced control over permission requests. The selected permissions are based on the apps’ run-time permission access patterns and explanations, and commonly known visual cues are used to facilitate the user’s understanding and privacy-conscious decision making. Furthermore, the effects of perceived control over information sharing and privacy awareness are examined in combination with the permission manager mockup app to investigate if increased control over information sharing increases general privacy awareness. Our results show an interplay between increased control and privacy awareness when explanations and common visual cues are presented to the user. However, the direction of the interplay between increased control and privacy awareness was surprising. Privacy awareness dropped for the experimental group, which received advanced explanations and visual nudges for privacy-conscious decision making. Interestingly privacy awareness significantly increased for the control group, which only received a plain privacy nudge. Therefore, we suggest that increased control over information sharing does not necessarily lead to improved privacy-decision making, and privacy by default might be a more effective design choice.","PeriodicalId":306813,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3538969.3543790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Android applications request specific permissions from users during the installations to perform required functionalities by accessing system resources and personal information. Usually, users must approve the permissions requested by applications (apps) during the installation process and before the apps can collect privacy- or security-relevant information. However, recent studies have shown that users are overwhelmed with the information provided in privacy policies and do not understand permission requests and which functionalities are necessary for certain applications. Hereby, the collection of personal information remains mostly hidden, as the task of verifying to which information different apps have access to can be very complicated. Therefore, it is necessary to develop frameworks and apps that enable the user to perform informed decisions about apps’ run-time permission access to facilitate the control over sensitive information collected by various apps on smartphones. In this work, we conducted an online study with 70 participants who interacted with a mockup app that enables advanced control over permission requests. The selected permissions are based on the apps’ run-time permission access patterns and explanations, and commonly known visual cues are used to facilitate the user’s understanding and privacy-conscious decision making. Furthermore, the effects of perceived control over information sharing and privacy awareness are examined in combination with the permission manager mockup app to investigate if increased control over information sharing increases general privacy awareness. Our results show an interplay between increased control and privacy awareness when explanations and common visual cues are presented to the user. However, the direction of the interplay between increased control and privacy awareness was surprising. Privacy awareness dropped for the experimental group, which received advanced explanations and visual nudges for privacy-conscious decision making. Interestingly privacy awareness significantly increased for the control group, which only received a plain privacy nudge. Therefore, we suggest that increased control over information sharing does not necessarily lead to improved privacy-decision making, and privacy by default might be a more effective design choice.
Android权限管理器,视觉提示及其对隐私意识和隐私素养的影响
Android应用程序在安装过程中通过访问系统资源和个人信息,向用户请求特定的权限来执行所需的功能。通常情况下,用户必须在安装过程中批准应用程序(app)请求的权限,然后应用程序才能收集与隐私或安全相关的信息。然而,最近的研究表明,用户被隐私政策中提供的信息淹没,不理解权限请求以及某些应用程序需要哪些功能。因此,个人信息的收集大部分是隐藏的,因为验证不同应用程序可以访问哪些信息的任务可能非常复杂。因此,有必要开发框架和应用程序,使用户能够对应用程序的运行时权限访问进行明智的决策,以促进对智能手机上各种应用程序收集的敏感信息的控制。在这项工作中,我们对70名参与者进行了一项在线研究,他们与一个模拟应用程序进行交互,该应用程序可以对权限请求进行高级控制。所选择的权限是基于应用程序的运行时权限访问模式和解释,并且通常使用已知的视觉提示来促进用户的理解和隐私意识决策。此外,感知控制对信息共享和隐私意识的影响与权限管理器模型应用程序相结合,以调查增加对信息共享的控制是否会增加一般的隐私意识。我们的研究结果表明,当解释和常见的视觉提示呈现给用户时,增加的控制和隐私意识之间存在相互作用。然而,加强控制和隐私意识之间相互作用的方向令人惊讶。实验组的隐私意识下降了,他们在隐私意识决策方面得到了先进的解释和视觉提示。有趣的是,控制组的隐私意识明显增强,而控制组只收到了简单的隐私提示。因此,我们认为增加对信息共享的控制并不一定会改善隐私决策,默认隐私可能是一种更有效的设计选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信