Performance testing of NoSQL and RDBMS for storing big data in e-applications

Pavel Seda, Jiri Hosek, Pavel Mašek, Jirí Pokorný
{"title":"Performance testing of NoSQL and RDBMS for storing big data in e-applications","authors":"Pavel Seda, Jiri Hosek, Pavel Mašek, Jirí Pokorný","doi":"10.1109/IGBSG.2018.8393559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of big data and the Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly accelerating and affecting all areas of communication technologies and businesses by increasing the benefits for organizations and individuals. The growth of data produced via IoT has played a major role on the big data landscape. The paper is concerned with respect to the Big Data key-value pairs from different database types using the latest version of Elasticsearch 6.0 and classic relational database as MySQL 5.5. This stands for the crucial topics since many databases are used these days and it is difficult to choose the right database for specific scenario. The correct choice for specific scenario is very important in e-applications or communication systems, because it is supposed to save a lot of money and effort. This work aims at comparing and testing Elasticsearch and MySQL DB (Database) with related frameworks e.g., Spring Data. This particular comparison is done via searching values in larger key-value datasets. At this point, it is very important to know which database to choose in this scenario, because it is often used in e-applications e.g., when e-application wants to store session ID and user time spent in e-app. Simulation scenarios in this paper were created using real data sets provided by IBM internal e-learning app. Based on performed tests, authors provide the community with a suitable way of storing data.","PeriodicalId":356367,"journal":{"name":"2018 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGBSG.2018.8393559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The development of big data and the Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly accelerating and affecting all areas of communication technologies and businesses by increasing the benefits for organizations and individuals. The growth of data produced via IoT has played a major role on the big data landscape. The paper is concerned with respect to the Big Data key-value pairs from different database types using the latest version of Elasticsearch 6.0 and classic relational database as MySQL 5.5. This stands for the crucial topics since many databases are used these days and it is difficult to choose the right database for specific scenario. The correct choice for specific scenario is very important in e-applications or communication systems, because it is supposed to save a lot of money and effort. This work aims at comparing and testing Elasticsearch and MySQL DB (Database) with related frameworks e.g., Spring Data. This particular comparison is done via searching values in larger key-value datasets. At this point, it is very important to know which database to choose in this scenario, because it is often used in e-applications e.g., when e-application wants to store session ID and user time spent in e-app. Simulation scenarios in this paper were created using real data sets provided by IBM internal e-learning app. Based on performed tests, authors provide the community with a suitable way of storing data.
电子应用中存储大数据的NoSQL和RDBMS性能测试
大数据和物联网(IoT)的发展正在迅速加速,并通过增加组织和个人的利益来影响通信技术和业务的各个领域。通过物联网产生的数据增长在大数据领域发挥了重要作用。本文使用最新版本的Elasticsearch 6.0和经典关系数据库MySQL 5.5,对不同数据库类型的大数据键值对进行了研究。这代表了关键的主题,因为现在使用了许多数据库,很难为特定的场景选择正确的数据库。在电子应用程序或通信系统中,针对特定场景的正确选择非常重要,因为这样可以节省大量的资金和精力。这项工作的目的是比较和测试Elasticsearch和MySQL DB(数据库)与相关框架,如Spring Data。这种特殊的比较是通过搜索较大的键值数据集中的值来完成的。在这一点上,知道在这种情况下选择哪个数据库非常重要,因为它经常用于电子应用程序,例如,当电子应用程序想要存储会话ID和用户在电子应用程序中花费的时间时。本文使用IBM内部电子学习应用程序提供的真实数据集创建仿真场景。根据已进行的测试,作者为社区提供了一种适合的数据存储方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信