Total macular volume as a potential biomarker in the assessment of anti-VEGF response in patients with diabetic macular edema: real-life data analysis

Eren Ekici, A. K. Kocak altintas
{"title":"Total macular volume as a potential biomarker in the assessment of anti-VEGF response in patients with diabetic macular edema: real-life data analysis","authors":"Eren Ekici, A. K. Kocak altintas","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1205486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the functional and anatomic efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and investigate the association between central macular thickness (CMT) and total macular volume (TMV) in real-life settings.Material and Method: In this retrospective, observational, longitudinal study 38 eyes of 23 consecutive patients with center-involving DME were included. A loading phase of three monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections was initiated, followed by anti-VEGF injections if needed as per clinicians’ discretion. Results: Mean Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters gained was 3.2 letters at month 12. The reduction in the mean of CMT and TMV were 60 μm and 1.33 mm3 respectively at the end of 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was negatively correlated with CMT (r=-0.573, p < 0.01) and TMV (r=-0.533, p < 0.01) initially. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the CMT and the TMV initially (r=0.765, p < 0.01) and month 12 (r=0.937, p < 0.01). Baseline TMV was found to be more predictive of treatment response at the 9th month than baseline CMT. Conclusion: It is demonstrated that TMV may be a suitable biomarker in the assessment of treatment response of the macular region when regarded as a complete three-dimensional macular unit instead of central vertical thickness only. Although the present study contributes to a better understanding of managing DME in real-life settings, further prospective, and controlled investigations are needed.","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1205486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the functional and anatomic efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and investigate the association between central macular thickness (CMT) and total macular volume (TMV) in real-life settings.Material and Method: In this retrospective, observational, longitudinal study 38 eyes of 23 consecutive patients with center-involving DME were included. A loading phase of three monthly intravitreal anti-VEGF injections was initiated, followed by anti-VEGF injections if needed as per clinicians’ discretion. Results: Mean Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters gained was 3.2 letters at month 12. The reduction in the mean of CMT and TMV were 60 μm and 1.33 mm3 respectively at the end of 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was negatively correlated with CMT (r=-0.573, p < 0.01) and TMV (r=-0.533, p < 0.01) initially. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the CMT and the TMV initially (r=0.765, p < 0.01) and month 12 (r=0.937, p < 0.01). Baseline TMV was found to be more predictive of treatment response at the 9th month than baseline CMT. Conclusion: It is demonstrated that TMV may be a suitable biomarker in the assessment of treatment response of the macular region when regarded as a complete three-dimensional macular unit instead of central vertical thickness only. Although the present study contributes to a better understanding of managing DME in real-life settings, further prospective, and controlled investigations are needed.
黄斑总体积作为评估糖尿病黄斑水肿患者抗vegf反应的潜在生物标志物:现实数据分析
目的:评价玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的功能和解剖效果,探讨现实生活中黄斑中央厚度(CMT)与黄斑总体积(TMV)的关系。材料与方法:在这项回顾性、观察性、纵向研究中,纳入了23例连续累及中心的DME患者的38只眼。开始了每月3次玻璃体内抗vegf注射的加载阶段,随后根据临床医生的判断需要进行抗vegf注射。结果:12个月时,早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)的平均字母增加为3.2个字母。12个月后,CMT和TMV的平均值分别下降了60 μm和1.33 mm3。最佳矫正视力(BCVA)与CMT (r=-0.573, p < 0.01)、TMV (r=-0.533, p < 0.01)初始呈负相关。CMT与TMV初始值(r=0.765, p < 0.01)和第12个月(r=0.937, p < 0.01)呈正相关,有统计学意义。发现基线TMV比基线CMT更能预测第9个月的治疗反应。结论:TMV作为一个完整的三维黄斑单元,而不仅仅是中心垂直厚度,可以作为评价黄斑区域治疗效果的一个合适的生物标志物。虽然目前的研究有助于更好地理解在现实环境中管理二甲醚,但需要进一步的前瞻性和对照调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信