Formulate Evaluation Questions (Step 2)

E. Ricci, E. Pretto, K. O. Sundnes
{"title":"Formulate Evaluation Questions (Step 2)","authors":"E. Ricci, E. Pretto, K. O. Sundnes","doi":"10.1093/med/9780198796862.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter we define the five basic categories of evaluation, namely structure (resources), process (activities), outcomes, adequacy, and costs associated with the response(s). Structure refers to the equipment and personnel and the way in which these resources were organized for use in the medical response. Process refers to the activities carried out during the disaster response. Outcome assessment concerns the results of the care provided on the patients served, usually measured over time. Adequacy describes the extent to which the search-and-rescue, pre-hospital and hospital, and public health responses were able to meet the needs of the community during the disaster response. In general, these categories are consistent with the design of a typical logic model. Following the discussion of ‘evaluation categories’ we suggest questions that the evaluation team might consider for inclusion in the evaluation study. For each category we suggest questions which could be addressed in any disaster evaluation study which focuses on the medical and public health response. The stakeholder group should be fully involved in the selection of questions to be addressed by the evaluation team.","PeriodicalId":304773,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Evaluation Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Evaluation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198796862.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter we define the five basic categories of evaluation, namely structure (resources), process (activities), outcomes, adequacy, and costs associated with the response(s). Structure refers to the equipment and personnel and the way in which these resources were organized for use in the medical response. Process refers to the activities carried out during the disaster response. Outcome assessment concerns the results of the care provided on the patients served, usually measured over time. Adequacy describes the extent to which the search-and-rescue, pre-hospital and hospital, and public health responses were able to meet the needs of the community during the disaster response. In general, these categories are consistent with the design of a typical logic model. Following the discussion of ‘evaluation categories’ we suggest questions that the evaluation team might consider for inclusion in the evaluation study. For each category we suggest questions which could be addressed in any disaster evaluation study which focuses on the medical and public health response. The stakeholder group should be fully involved in the selection of questions to be addressed by the evaluation team.
制定评估问题(第二步)
在本章中,我们定义了评估的五个基本类别,即结构(资源)、过程(活动)、结果、充分性和与响应相关的成本。结构是指设备和人员以及组织这些资源用于医疗应对的方式。过程是指在灾难响应过程中进行的活动。结果评估涉及对所服务的患者提供的护理的结果,通常随时间测量。充足性是指在灾害应对期间,搜救、院前和医院以及公共卫生应对能够满足社区需求的程度。一般来说,这些类别与典型逻辑模型的设计是一致的。在讨论“评估类别”之后,我们提出了评估小组可能考虑纳入评估研究的问题。对于每一个类别,我们提出了可以在任何侧重于医疗和公共卫生应对的灾害评估研究中解决的问题。利益相关者群体应该充分参与到评估团队要解决的问题的选择中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信