Governing the Void between Stakeholder Management and Sustainability

Michael L. Barnett, I. Henriques, B. Husted
{"title":"Governing the Void between Stakeholder Management and Sustainability","authors":"Michael L. Barnett, I. Henriques, B. Husted","doi":"10.1108/S0742-332220180000038010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nIn this chapter, we explain why firms selectively responding to the most powerful, legitimate, and urgent demands of their stakeholders will not bring about sustainability and offer suggestions on what we should do in light of this shortcoming. Sustainability issues tend to be wicked problems that require cooperation across parties and over time to define and resolve. Stakeholder pressures can bring sustainability to the fore, but government intervention is necessary to drive meaningful action to resolve such issues. Without government intervention, self-interested stakeholders can pressure firms to move away from the complex, long-term challenges of wicked problems. Yet, stakeholder pressure is also necessary, as without it, industries may self-regulate in self-serving ways. Our analysis thus suggests that collaboration between business, government, and other stakeholders is necessary to resolve the wicked problems of sustainability. We therefore urge the stakeholder literature to move beyond its libertarian underpinnings by (re)incorporating government into models of effective corporate governance.","PeriodicalId":201560,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Other Corporate Governance: Social Responsibility & Social Impact (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000038010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Abstract In this chapter, we explain why firms selectively responding to the most powerful, legitimate, and urgent demands of their stakeholders will not bring about sustainability and offer suggestions on what we should do in light of this shortcoming. Sustainability issues tend to be wicked problems that require cooperation across parties and over time to define and resolve. Stakeholder pressures can bring sustainability to the fore, but government intervention is necessary to drive meaningful action to resolve such issues. Without government intervention, self-interested stakeholders can pressure firms to move away from the complex, long-term challenges of wicked problems. Yet, stakeholder pressure is also necessary, as without it, industries may self-regulate in self-serving ways. Our analysis thus suggests that collaboration between business, government, and other stakeholders is necessary to resolve the wicked problems of sustainability. We therefore urge the stakeholder literature to move beyond its libertarian underpinnings by (re)incorporating government into models of effective corporate governance.
治理利益相关者管理与可持续性之间的空白
在本章中,我们解释了为什么企业有选择地回应其利益相关者最强大、最合法和最紧迫的要求不会带来可持续性,并针对这一缺点提供了我们应该做的建议。可持续性问题往往是邪恶的问题,需要跨党派合作,并随着时间的推移来定义和解决。利益相关者的压力可以将可持续性带到突出位置,但政府干预是必要的,以推动有意义的行动来解决这些问题。在没有政府干预的情况下,自私自利的利益相关者可以向企业施加压力,使其远离复杂的、长期的挑战。然而,利益相关者的压力也是必要的,因为没有它,行业可能会以自私的方式进行自我监管。因此,我们的分析表明,企业、政府和其他利益相关者之间的合作对于解决可持续发展的棘手问题是必要的。因此,我们敦促利益相关者文献通过(重新)将政府纳入有效公司治理模型来超越其自由主义基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信