An empirical study of developers views on software reuse in statoil ASA

Odd Petter N. Slyngstad, Anita Gupta, R. Conradi, Parastoo Mohagheghi, Harald Rønneberg, E. Landre
{"title":"An empirical study of developers views on software reuse in statoil ASA","authors":"Odd Petter N. Slyngstad, Anita Gupta, R. Conradi, Parastoo Mohagheghi, Harald Rønneberg, E. Landre","doi":"10.1145/1159733.1159770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we describe the results from our survey in the ITdepartment of a large Oil and Gas company in Norway (Statoil ASA), in order to characterize developers' views on software reuse. We have used a survey followed by semi-structured interviews, investigating software reuse in relation to requirements (re)negotiation, value of component information repository, component understanding and quality attribute specifications. All 16 developers participated in the survey and filled in the questionnaire based on their experience and views on software reuse. Our study focuses on components built and reused in-house. The results show that reuse benefits from the developers view include lower costs, shorter development time, higher quality of the reusable components and a standardized architecture. Component information repositories can contribute to successful software reuse However, we found no relation between reuse and increased rework. Component understanding was generally sufficient, but documentation could be improved. A key point here is dynamic and interactive documents. Finally, quality attribute specifications were trusted for the applications using reusable components in new development, but not for the reusable components themselves.","PeriodicalId":201305,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

In this article, we describe the results from our survey in the ITdepartment of a large Oil and Gas company in Norway (Statoil ASA), in order to characterize developers' views on software reuse. We have used a survey followed by semi-structured interviews, investigating software reuse in relation to requirements (re)negotiation, value of component information repository, component understanding and quality attribute specifications. All 16 developers participated in the survey and filled in the questionnaire based on their experience and views on software reuse. Our study focuses on components built and reused in-house. The results show that reuse benefits from the developers view include lower costs, shorter development time, higher quality of the reusable components and a standardized architecture. Component information repositories can contribute to successful software reuse However, we found no relation between reuse and increased rework. Component understanding was generally sufficient, but documentation could be improved. A key point here is dynamic and interactive documents. Finally, quality attribute specifications were trusted for the applications using reusable components in new development, but not for the reusable components themselves.
statoil ASA开发人员软件重用观点的实证研究
在本文中,我们描述了我们在挪威一家大型石油和天然气公司(Statoil ASA)的it部门进行的调查结果,以便描述开发人员对软件重用的看法。我们使用了半结构化访谈之后的调查,调查了与需求(重新)协商、组件信息存储库的价值、组件理解和质量属性规范相关的软件重用。所有16名开发人员都参与了调查,并根据他们的经验和对软件重用的看法填写了问卷。我们的研究集中在内部构建和重用的组件上。结果表明,从开发人员的角度来看,重用的好处包括更低的成本、更短的开发时间、更高质量的可重用组件和标准化的体系结构。组件信息库有助于成功的软件重用。然而,我们发现重用和增加的返工之间没有关系。组件理解通常是足够的,但是文档可以改进。这里的一个关键点是动态和交互式文档。最后,质量属性规范对于在新开发中使用可重用组件的应用程序是可信的,但对于可重用组件本身则不可信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信