A brief review and comparative analysis of two classical MPPT techniques

Debabrata Routray, P. Rout, B. K. Sahu
{"title":"A brief review and comparative analysis of two classical MPPT techniques","authors":"Debabrata Routray, P. Rout, B. K. Sahu","doi":"10.1109/APSIT52773.2021.9641301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To enhance the output efficiency of the photovoltaic (PV) arrays, it is indispensable to track the maximum power point (MPP) to extract maximum power in the energy conversion process. However, this has become a challenging issue in the past many years due to the nonlinear characteristics of the PV cell and the adverse impact of temperature variation, irradiance change, partial shading, dust, and aging effect on the output generation. In maximum power point tracking (MPPT), the duty cycle of the DC-DC converter is adjusted in a way that the maximum possible power is extracted from the PV system. This paper has two major objectives to present as a brief review of the methods suggested in recent times and comparing the two classical techniques Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (IC) technique used most in real-time applications. A discussion on possible challenges and issues has been entailed at the end to serve as a vital reference to guide the system engineers to develop better techniques for MPPT control in the future.","PeriodicalId":436488,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference in Advances in Power, Signal, and Information Technology (APSIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIT52773.2021.9641301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To enhance the output efficiency of the photovoltaic (PV) arrays, it is indispensable to track the maximum power point (MPP) to extract maximum power in the energy conversion process. However, this has become a challenging issue in the past many years due to the nonlinear characteristics of the PV cell and the adverse impact of temperature variation, irradiance change, partial shading, dust, and aging effect on the output generation. In maximum power point tracking (MPPT), the duty cycle of the DC-DC converter is adjusted in a way that the maximum possible power is extracted from the PV system. This paper has two major objectives to present as a brief review of the methods suggested in recent times and comparing the two classical techniques Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (IC) technique used most in real-time applications. A discussion on possible challenges and issues has been entailed at the end to serve as a vital reference to guide the system engineers to develop better techniques for MPPT control in the future.
两种经典MPPT技术的简要回顾和比较分析
为了提高光伏阵列的输出效率,在能量转换过程中必须跟踪最大功率点以提取最大功率。然而,由于光伏电池的非线性特性以及温度变化、辐照度变化、部分遮阳、灰尘和老化效应对输出发电的不利影响,这在过去的许多年里已经成为一个具有挑战性的问题。在最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)中,调整DC-DC变换器的占空比,使其从光伏系统中提取最大可能的功率。本文的两个主要目的是简要回顾最近提出的方法,并比较实时应用中最常用的两种经典技术摄动与观察(P&O)和增量电导(IC)技术。最后对可能的挑战和问题进行了讨论,作为指导系统工程师将来开发更好的MPPT控制技术的重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信