Does Design Thinking Training Really Increase Creativity? Results from an Experiment with Middle-School Students

H. Rao, P. Puranam, Jasjit Singh
{"title":"Does Design Thinking Training Really Increase Creativity? Results from an Experiment with Middle-School Students","authors":"H. Rao, P. Puranam, Jasjit Singh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3543943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design thinking remains mired in controversy. Its proponents claim that it enhances not just confidence but also creativity, but its opponents question whether it does anything beyond building unfounded confidence. In order to bring rigorous evidence to this debate, we designed a randomized experiment amongst school children served by a major non-governmental organization in rural India. A well-established design thinking intervention for school children comprised the treatment, and the organization’s existing science-based intervention for hands-on learning served as the control condition. The findings reveal that the design thinking training did not just increase confidence: it also significantly increased ideational fluency and elaboration in a divergent thinking task, although the originality and flexibility of the generated ideas was on average lower in the treatment group than the control group. The intervention had no effect on perspective taking or risk aversion. We also find that the increase in confidence occurred primarily among female students, whereas the increase in ideational fluency and elaboration occurred for both genders.","PeriodicalId":424979,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Secondary Education (Topic)","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Secondary Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3543943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Design thinking remains mired in controversy. Its proponents claim that it enhances not just confidence but also creativity, but its opponents question whether it does anything beyond building unfounded confidence. In order to bring rigorous evidence to this debate, we designed a randomized experiment amongst school children served by a major non-governmental organization in rural India. A well-established design thinking intervention for school children comprised the treatment, and the organization’s existing science-based intervention for hands-on learning served as the control condition. The findings reveal that the design thinking training did not just increase confidence: it also significantly increased ideational fluency and elaboration in a divergent thinking task, although the originality and flexibility of the generated ideas was on average lower in the treatment group than the control group. The intervention had no effect on perspective taking or risk aversion. We also find that the increase in confidence occurred primarily among female students, whereas the increase in ideational fluency and elaboration occurred for both genders.
设计思维训练真的能提高创造力吗?中学生实验结果分析
设计思维仍然深陷争议之中。它的支持者声称,它不仅增强了信心,还增强了创造力,但它的反对者质疑,除了建立毫无根据的信心之外,它是否还有其他作用。为了给这场辩论带来严谨的证据,我们在印度农村的一个主要非政府组织服务的学生中设计了一个随机实验。一项完善的针对在校儿童的设计思维干预包括治疗,该组织现有的基于科学的动手学习干预作为控制条件。研究结果表明,设计思维训练不仅增强了自信心,而且还显著提高了发散思维任务中思想的流畅性和精细化程度,尽管治疗组产生的想法的原创性和灵活性平均低于对照组。干预对观点接受或风险厌恶没有影响。我们还发现,自信心的增强主要发生在女学生中,而思想流畅性和阐述能力的增强则发生在男女学生中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信