The Mirage of Time Throughout Modern Phsyics: Scandalous Life of an Impostor

Joseph Jean-Claude
{"title":"The Mirage of Time Throughout Modern Phsyics: Scandalous Life of an Impostor","authors":"Joseph Jean-Claude","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3272015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"That bound electrons, entire atoms and molecules want nothing to do with time as a physical variable had been a traumatizing lesson taught to us by E. Schrodinger’s Quantum Mechanics since its inception in early 20th Century. In the same period, A. Einstein undertook to deflate the notion of time as well in his Relativity analysis of astrophysical dynamics by showing the dependency of the physical variable on motion, mass and gravitation. He was so driven to the conclusion that time had to dilate in order to remain workable and a useful concept in cosmological physics. The most important underlying obstacles that these destabilizing visions of physical time had to counter all along had been the very appealing practicality and self-evidence that the notion instills in the conscious experience of both the educated minds and that of the common man. For that reason the notion of time has never died in physics despite the increasing sentiment amongst physicists that there is indeed a very serious problem with this notion. Many today are willing to concede that time is not “fundamental” in reacting to such experiments as quantum entanglement of particles and atoms, and the implications of such experiments alike. Yet the visualization of a macroscopic world completely bereft of time-driven phenomenology has not been successfully formulated if severally attempted. In this thesis, I aim to review the concept of time and time flow from a philosophical standpoint, as well as their application in physics from Newtonian Physics to Relativity. I propose and substantiate the view that emerges from Quanto-Geometric analysis, which is that the notion of time is vacuous and unnecessary for a comprehensive description of Nature, in favor of a space perspective.","PeriodicalId":203793,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Time & Space (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Time & Space (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3272015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

That bound electrons, entire atoms and molecules want nothing to do with time as a physical variable had been a traumatizing lesson taught to us by E. Schrodinger’s Quantum Mechanics since its inception in early 20th Century. In the same period, A. Einstein undertook to deflate the notion of time as well in his Relativity analysis of astrophysical dynamics by showing the dependency of the physical variable on motion, mass and gravitation. He was so driven to the conclusion that time had to dilate in order to remain workable and a useful concept in cosmological physics. The most important underlying obstacles that these destabilizing visions of physical time had to counter all along had been the very appealing practicality and self-evidence that the notion instills in the conscious experience of both the educated minds and that of the common man. For that reason the notion of time has never died in physics despite the increasing sentiment amongst physicists that there is indeed a very serious problem with this notion. Many today are willing to concede that time is not “fundamental” in reacting to such experiments as quantum entanglement of particles and atoms, and the implications of such experiments alike. Yet the visualization of a macroscopic world completely bereft of time-driven phenomenology has not been successfully formulated if severally attempted. In this thesis, I aim to review the concept of time and time flow from a philosophical standpoint, as well as their application in physics from Newtonian Physics to Relativity. I propose and substantiate the view that emerges from Quanto-Geometric analysis, which is that the notion of time is vacuous and unnecessary for a comprehensive description of Nature, in favor of a space perspective.
贯穿现代物理学的时间幻影:一个冒名顶替者的丑闻生活
自20世纪初薛定谔的量子力学创立以来,束缚电子、整个原子和分子都不想把时间作为一个物理变量,这是一个令人痛苦的教训。在同一时期,A.爱因斯坦在他的天体物理动力学的相对论分析中,通过展示物理变量对运动、质量和引力的依赖,开始缩小时间的概念。他被迫得出这样的结论:时间必须膨胀,才能在宇宙物理学中保持可行和有用的概念。一直以来,这些不稳定的物理时间观所要克服的最重要的潜在障碍,是它在受过教育的人和普通人的意识体验中所灌输的非常吸引人的实用性和自明性。由于这个原因,时间的概念在物理学中从未消亡,尽管物理学家越来越多地认为这个概念确实存在一个非常严重的问题。今天,许多人愿意承认,在对粒子和原子的量子纠缠等实验作出反应时,时间并不是“基本的”,也不是这类实验的含义。然而,一个完全没有时间驱动的现象学的宏观世界的可视化,即使经过多次尝试,也没有成功地形成。在这篇论文中,我旨在从哲学的角度回顾时间和时间流的概念,以及它们在物理学中的应用,从牛顿物理学到相对论。我提出并证实了从量子几何分析中产生的观点,即时间的概念是空虚的,对于全面描述自然是不必要的,有利于空间视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信