Using Q methodology in comparative policy analysis

Astrid Molenveld
{"title":"Using Q methodology in comparative policy analysis","authors":"Astrid Molenveld","doi":"10.4337/9781788111195.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective policy measures, free from preferences, do they exist? Numerous scholars and practitioners would argue that they do not (Brown, 1974; Howlett, 2009; Peters & Hoornbeek, 2005; Scharpf, 2000; Wlezien, 2004). Authors say that ideas about the nature of knowledge, the approach, envisioned outcomes, spending and politics associated with policy solutions differ among stakeholders, politicians, civil servants and citizens (Peters, 1998). In other words, both the problem and solutions are often viewed by multiple stakeholders, who have different interests and values, from a different angle. This is typically how wicked and complex policy problems are described (Rittel & Webber, 1973; Termeer, Dewulf, & Breeman, 2013).","PeriodicalId":264585,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Comparative Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788111195.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective policy measures, free from preferences, do they exist? Numerous scholars and practitioners would argue that they do not (Brown, 1974; Howlett, 2009; Peters & Hoornbeek, 2005; Scharpf, 2000; Wlezien, 2004). Authors say that ideas about the nature of knowledge, the approach, envisioned outcomes, spending and politics associated with policy solutions differ among stakeholders, politicians, civil servants and citizens (Peters, 1998). In other words, both the problem and solutions are often viewed by multiple stakeholders, who have different interests and values, from a different angle. This is typically how wicked and complex policy problems are described (Rittel & Webber, 1973; Termeer, Dewulf, & Breeman, 2013).
在比较政策分析中运用Q方法
客观的、没有优惠的政策措施存在吗?许多学者和实践者会认为他们没有(Brown, 1974;Howlett, 2009;Peters & Hoornbeek, 2005;Scharpf, 2000;Wlezien, 2004)。作者说,关于知识的本质、方法、预期结果、与政策解决方案相关的支出和政治的想法在利益相关者、政治家、公务员和公民之间存在差异(Peters, 1998)。换句话说,问题和解决方案往往是由多个利益相关者从不同的角度来看待的,他们有不同的利益和价值观。这是描述邪恶和复杂政策问题的典型方式(Rittel & Webber, 1973;Termeer, Dewulf, & Breeman, 2013)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信