The Analysis of Critically Stressed Fractures with Reconstruction of Tectonic Stresses for Ranging the Area by Production Rates via Example of Riphean Carbonate Fractured Reservoir

S. Zhigulskiy, A. Rotaru, V. Kurbanov, D. Zadvornov, D. Maximov, A. Eremeev, Pavel Rijikov
{"title":"The Analysis of Critically Stressed Fractures with Reconstruction of Tectonic Stresses for Ranging the Area by Production Rates via Example of Riphean Carbonate Fractured Reservoir","authors":"S. Zhigulskiy, A. Rotaru, V. Kurbanov, D. Zadvornov, D. Maximov, A. Eremeev, Pavel Rijikov","doi":"10.2118/191627-18RPTC-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, the geomechanical analysis of the Riphean fractured carbonate resevior of East Siberia is provided. The research of fissuring and its further deformation mechanism is necessary both for drilling risk assessment (prediction of fluid losses zones due to intensive natural fracturing) and for ranging of perspective drilling zone in terms of its productivity.\n For described reservoir it is supposed, that natural fractures are the main driver of wells productivity. Reservoir rock is characterized by low average matrix porosity (lower than 3%), which does not influence wells productivity.\n As for fractures system, according to production logging (spectral noise survey), wide-bend acoustic logging (Stoneley wave interpretation), formation imager (resistivity and acoustic), drilling data (fluid losses) it was concluded that not all fractures are permeable. Comparison of fracture characteristics from different surveys shows that working intervals according to SNL mismatch with permeable intervals from Stoneley wave interpretation and do not fit with maximum fracture density intervals from formation imager.\n The analysis showed mismatching of productive intervals from Stoneley wave interpretation and SNL results and absence of direct correlation between fracturing and productive intervals for both methods. This can be explained by low amount of working fractures: less than the half of horizontal section works. Moreover, the risk of drilling throught \"dry\" zone, where no permeable fractures exist, was confirmed by several unsuccessfull wells.\n On the base of geological and morphological fracture features such as intensity, dip angle, orientation there is no ability to subdivide dry and permeable fractures. That is why for better reservoir understanding the mechanism of fracture occurance, development and activation is analysed.\n Application of geomechanical modeling for fractures assessment and subsequent forecast of productive zones is rather nontrivial and complex task that required abandoning the traditional approach of creating a geomechanical model in which the main emphasis is on a wellbore stability calculation.","PeriodicalId":242965,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 16, 2018","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 16, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191627-18RPTC-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the geomechanical analysis of the Riphean fractured carbonate resevior of East Siberia is provided. The research of fissuring and its further deformation mechanism is necessary both for drilling risk assessment (prediction of fluid losses zones due to intensive natural fracturing) and for ranging of perspective drilling zone in terms of its productivity. For described reservoir it is supposed, that natural fractures are the main driver of wells productivity. Reservoir rock is characterized by low average matrix porosity (lower than 3%), which does not influence wells productivity. As for fractures system, according to production logging (spectral noise survey), wide-bend acoustic logging (Stoneley wave interpretation), formation imager (resistivity and acoustic), drilling data (fluid losses) it was concluded that not all fractures are permeable. Comparison of fracture characteristics from different surveys shows that working intervals according to SNL mismatch with permeable intervals from Stoneley wave interpretation and do not fit with maximum fracture density intervals from formation imager. The analysis showed mismatching of productive intervals from Stoneley wave interpretation and SNL results and absence of direct correlation between fracturing and productive intervals for both methods. This can be explained by low amount of working fractures: less than the half of horizontal section works. Moreover, the risk of drilling throught "dry" zone, where no permeable fractures exist, was confirmed by several unsuccessfull wells. On the base of geological and morphological fracture features such as intensity, dip angle, orientation there is no ability to subdivide dry and permeable fractures. That is why for better reservoir understanding the mechanism of fracture occurance, development and activation is analysed. Application of geomechanical modeling for fractures assessment and subsequent forecast of productive zones is rather nontrivial and complex task that required abandoning the traditional approach of creating a geomechanical model in which the main emphasis is on a wellbore stability calculation.
以里番碳酸盐岩裂缝性储层为例,以构造应力重建为依据的临界应力裂缝分析
本文对东西伯利亚Riphean裂缝性碳酸盐岩储层进行了地质力学分析。裂缝及其进一步变形机制的研究,无论是对钻井风险评估(预测密集自然压裂造成的失液区),还是从产能角度确定钻井层位,都是必要的。对于所描述的储层,假定天然裂缝是井产能的主要驱动因素。储层岩石的特征是平均基质孔隙度较低(低于3%),不影响油井产能。对于裂缝系统,根据生产测井(频谱噪声测量)、宽弯声波测井(斯通利波解释)、地层成成仪(电阻率和声波)、钻井数据(流体损失量),得出并非所有裂缝都具有渗透性的结论。不同测量的裂缝特征对比表明,SNL工作层段与Stoneley波解释所得渗透率层段不匹配,与地层成像仪所得最大裂缝密度层段不匹配。分析表明,两种方法的斯通利波解释结果与SNL结果的生产层段不匹配,并且压裂与生产层段之间缺乏直接相关性。这可以解释为工作裂缝数量少:不到一半的水平段工作。此外,几口不成功的井也证实了钻进“干”层的风险,因为该层不存在渗透性裂缝。在裂缝强度、倾角、方位等地质和形态特征的基础上,无法细分干性裂缝和渗透性裂缝。因此,为了更好地了解储层裂缝的赋存、发育和活化机理,本文对裂缝进行了分析。将地质力学建模应用于裂缝评估和随后的生产层预测是一项相当艰巨和复杂的任务,需要放弃传统的建立地质力学模型的方法,这种方法主要强调井筒稳定性计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信