Assessment of Flap Viability and Post-operative Hand Function After Resurfacing of Acute Soft Tissue Injury onthe Palm of Hand byGroin Flap and Reverse Pedicled RadialForearm Flap

Mazumdar MSH, Khan MLR, Fattah IU, Roy SK, Rahman H
{"title":"Assessment of Flap Viability and Post-operative Hand Function After Resurfacing of Acute Soft Tissue Injury onthe Palm of Hand byGroin Flap and Reverse Pedicled RadialForearm Flap","authors":"Mazumdar MSH, Khan MLR, Fattah IU, Roy SK, Rahman H","doi":"10.47648/jswmc2023v13-01-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many flaps have been described and used for coverage of various soft tissue defects of hand, which can be regional or distant.\n\nObjective: In this study main goal is to evaluate the assessment of flap viability and post-operative hand function by Total Active Motion (TAM) and Hand grip strength.\n\nMethod: This was a comparative observational study, conducted at department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Burn and Plastic surgery in Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital (SOMCH) from January 2018 to October, 2019. A total of 16 patients with acute hand injury or pathology in the palm which may create surgical wound, admitted in the study place during the study period were the study population. Where those who had Acute wound in palm with exposed tendon, nerve and bones or degloving hand injury were included in the study. Patient were divided into two group namely Group-A and Group-B. Patient chosen for groin flap were allocated in group-A and for reverse pedicled radial forearm flap were in group-B.\n\nResults: During the study, complete flap survival was 100% in both group A and B. At all the follow-ups hand grip strength was more in group B and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05, obtained by unpaired t-test). At final follow-up (12 weeks) hand grip strength was 22.38 (SD±5.26) kg in Group A and 30.13 (SD±10.15) kg in Group B.There is no(0.0%) excellent result of index and middle finger in group A patient compared to 3 (37.5%) and 6 (75.0%) patients respectively in group B. Ingroup A3 patient had excellent outcome in ring fingercompared to 7 (87.5%) patients in group B. Majority (87.5%) patient‘s little finger was excellent in group A and 8(100.0%) in group B.The difference of index finger and middle finger were statistically significant between groups (p<0.05 obtained by Fisher Exact test).\n\nConclusion: From this study we can say that, both the handgrip strength and TAM score was better in patients who underwent radial forearm flap and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). It is concluded that reverse pedicled radial forearm flap has better outcome regarding flap viability and post-operative hand function than groin flap.","PeriodicalId":407803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2023v13-01-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many flaps have been described and used for coverage of various soft tissue defects of hand, which can be regional or distant. Objective: In this study main goal is to evaluate the assessment of flap viability and post-operative hand function by Total Active Motion (TAM) and Hand grip strength. Method: This was a comparative observational study, conducted at department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Burn and Plastic surgery in Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital (SOMCH) from January 2018 to October, 2019. A total of 16 patients with acute hand injury or pathology in the palm which may create surgical wound, admitted in the study place during the study period were the study population. Where those who had Acute wound in palm with exposed tendon, nerve and bones or degloving hand injury were included in the study. Patient were divided into two group namely Group-A and Group-B. Patient chosen for groin flap were allocated in group-A and for reverse pedicled radial forearm flap were in group-B. Results: During the study, complete flap survival was 100% in both group A and B. At all the follow-ups hand grip strength was more in group B and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05, obtained by unpaired t-test). At final follow-up (12 weeks) hand grip strength was 22.38 (SD±5.26) kg in Group A and 30.13 (SD±10.15) kg in Group B.There is no(0.0%) excellent result of index and middle finger in group A patient compared to 3 (37.5%) and 6 (75.0%) patients respectively in group B. Ingroup A3 patient had excellent outcome in ring fingercompared to 7 (87.5%) patients in group B. Majority (87.5%) patient‘s little finger was excellent in group A and 8(100.0%) in group B.The difference of index finger and middle finger were statistically significant between groups (p<0.05 obtained by Fisher Exact test). Conclusion: From this study we can say that, both the handgrip strength and TAM score was better in patients who underwent radial forearm flap and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). It is concluded that reverse pedicled radial forearm flap has better outcome regarding flap viability and post-operative hand function than groin flap.
腹股沟皮瓣与反向带蒂桡侧前臂皮瓣在急性手掌软组织损伤修复中的应用及术后手功能评价
背景:许多皮瓣已经被描述并用于覆盖手部的各种软组织缺陷,这些缺陷可以是局部的或远处的。目的:本研究的主要目的是通过总主动运动(TAM)和手部握力评估皮瓣生存能力和术后手部功能。方法:本研究是一项比较观察性研究,于2018年1月至2019年10月在Sylhet MAG Osmani医学院附属医院(SOMCH)骨科和烧伤整形外科进行。研究期间在研究地点收治的16例急性手部损伤或掌部病变可能造成手术伤口的患者为研究人群。研究对象为掌部急性创伤伴肌腱、神经、骨骼外露或手部脱手套损伤者。患者分为a组和b组。a组为腹股沟皮瓣组,b组为前臂桡侧带蒂皮瓣组。结果:研究期间,A组和B组皮瓣全成活率均为100%。B组随访手握力均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05,采用非配对t检验)。在最后的随访(12周)手握力是22.38 (SD±5.26)在A组和30.13公斤(SD±10.15)公斤B.There没有组(0.0%)优异成绩的食指和中指在患者组相比,3(37.5%)和6例(75.0%)患者分别在b组小集团A3病人良好的结果在环fingercompared 7例(87.5%)患者在b组多数(87.5%)病人小指的8 A组和b组(100.0%)差异的食指和中间组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,前臂桡侧皮瓣组握力及TAM评分均优于桡侧皮瓣组,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论前臂桡侧带蒂逆行皮瓣在皮瓣存活和术后手功能方面优于腹股沟皮瓣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信