Evaluation of Multi-Lead ECG Markers to Track Changes in Dispersion of Ventricular Repolarization in the Intact Human Heart

M. Orini, N. Srinivasan, P. Taggart, P. Lambiase
{"title":"Evaluation of Multi-Lead ECG Markers to Track Changes in Dispersion of Ventricular Repolarization in the Intact Human Heart","authors":"M. Orini, N. Srinivasan, P. Taggart, P. Lambiase","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2018.345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DRT) is an important factor contributing to the vulnerability to life-threatening arrhythmias. An accurate non-invasive methodology for its estimation would contribute to improve risk-prediction. We assessed 3 multi-lead ECG markers to track changes in DRT using intra-cardiac data recorded in patients with structurally normal ventricles. Changes in DRT were measured with intra-cardiac unipolar electrograms (UEG) simultaneously recorded in the RV endocardium (RVendo), LV endocardium (LVendo) and LV epicardium (coronary sinus, LVepi) in 10 patients. Standard S1S2 restitution protocols were conducted by pacing from the RVendo (n = 8), LVendo (n = 10) and LVepi (n = 7). DRT was measured as latest minus earliest re-polarization time (RT). In the surface ECG, DRT was estimated from precordial and augmented limb leads as: (1) Interval between the earliest and the latest maximum up-slope of the T-wave (ΔTup); (2) Interval between median T-peak and median T-end (Tpe,med); (3) Interval between the earliest T-peak and latest T-end (Tpe,range). Intra-patient correlation with DRT changes was higher using ΔTup (0.79, 0.66 - 0.89) than Tpe,med (0.61, 0.14 - 0.76, $P$ = 0.001) or Tpe,med(0.71, 0.44 - 0.79, $P$ = 0.054).","PeriodicalId":215521,"journal":{"name":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2018.345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DRT) is an important factor contributing to the vulnerability to life-threatening arrhythmias. An accurate non-invasive methodology for its estimation would contribute to improve risk-prediction. We assessed 3 multi-lead ECG markers to track changes in DRT using intra-cardiac data recorded in patients with structurally normal ventricles. Changes in DRT were measured with intra-cardiac unipolar electrograms (UEG) simultaneously recorded in the RV endocardium (RVendo), LV endocardium (LVendo) and LV epicardium (coronary sinus, LVepi) in 10 patients. Standard S1S2 restitution protocols were conducted by pacing from the RVendo (n = 8), LVendo (n = 10) and LVepi (n = 7). DRT was measured as latest minus earliest re-polarization time (RT). In the surface ECG, DRT was estimated from precordial and augmented limb leads as: (1) Interval between the earliest and the latest maximum up-slope of the T-wave (ΔTup); (2) Interval between median T-peak and median T-end (Tpe,med); (3) Interval between the earliest T-peak and latest T-end (Tpe,range). Intra-patient correlation with DRT changes was higher using ΔTup (0.79, 0.66 - 0.89) than Tpe,med (0.61, 0.14 - 0.76, $P$ = 0.001) or Tpe,med(0.71, 0.44 - 0.79, $P$ = 0.054).
多导联心电图标记物追踪完整心脏心室复极离散度变化的评价
心室复极离散度(DRT)是导致危及生命的心律失常的重要因素。一种准确的非侵入性估算方法将有助于改进风险预测。我们评估了3个多导联心电图标记物,利用心室结构正常的患者记录的心内数据来跟踪DRT的变化。通过同时记录左室心内膜(RVendo)、左室心内膜(LVendo)和左室心外膜(冠状窦,LVepi)的心内单极电图(UEG)测量10例患者的DRT变化。通过RVendo (n = 8)、LVendo (n = 10)和LVepi (n = 7)进行标准的S1S2恢复方案。DRT测量为最晚再极化时间减去最早再极化时间(RT)。在体表心电图中,从心前导联和增强肢体导联估计DRT为:(1)t波最早和最晚最大上斜率之间的间隔(ΔTup);(2)中位t峰与中位t端之间的间隔(Tpe,med);(3)最早t峰与最晚t端之间的间隔(type,range)。使用ΔTup与DRT变化的患者内部相关性(0.79,0.66 - 0.89)高于Tpe,med(0.61, 0.14 - 0.76, P$ = 0.001)或Tpe,med(0.71, 0.44 - 0.79, P$ = 0.054)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信