Complexity Measures for the Analysis of SDG Interlinkages: A Methodological Approach

G. Pereira, Arturo González, Gerardo L. Blanco
{"title":"Complexity Measures for the Analysis of SDG Interlinkages: A Methodological Approach","authors":"G. Pereira, Arturo González, Gerardo L. Blanco","doi":"10.5220/0010374600130024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2030 Agenda, with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 169 targets and 232 indicators, has set an ambitious “plan of action for people, planet and prosperity”1 that must be achieved within 15 years (2015-2030). These first years of implementation of the SDGs by the 193 member states of the United Nations (UN) have served the international community to realize the complexity of the network of interactions (synergies and trade-off) between goals, targets and indicators, within a context where each country has set its priorities of development and those are not always aligned with the main objective of the 2030 Agenda (lack of policy coherence; policy vs politics). As a result of this situation, one of the main difficulties that the countries will need to overcome is to comprehend the nature and complexity of the intricate network of interlinkages between the SDGs, considering their universal and integrated nature. The purpose of this study is to improve the understanding of the level of sustainability complexity of each member state of the UN in the process of the implementation of the SDGs based on the Product-Space Theory and the Economic Complexity. Thus, we present a SDG priority-setting tool applied to the challenging and ambitious task of accomplishment of the 2030 Agenda, through the understanding of the SDG interlinkages network and its complexity. Our findings are significant for the on-going debate of policy coherence and alignment of national policies with the SDGs and the sustainability path countries should follow to progress towards an integral achievement of the 2030 Agenda.","PeriodicalId":414016,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Complex Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0010374600130024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda, with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 169 targets and 232 indicators, has set an ambitious “plan of action for people, planet and prosperity”1 that must be achieved within 15 years (2015-2030). These first years of implementation of the SDGs by the 193 member states of the United Nations (UN) have served the international community to realize the complexity of the network of interactions (synergies and trade-off) between goals, targets and indicators, within a context where each country has set its priorities of development and those are not always aligned with the main objective of the 2030 Agenda (lack of policy coherence; policy vs politics). As a result of this situation, one of the main difficulties that the countries will need to overcome is to comprehend the nature and complexity of the intricate network of interlinkages between the SDGs, considering their universal and integrated nature. The purpose of this study is to improve the understanding of the level of sustainability complexity of each member state of the UN in the process of the implementation of the SDGs based on the Product-Space Theory and the Economic Complexity. Thus, we present a SDG priority-setting tool applied to the challenging and ambitious task of accomplishment of the 2030 Agenda, through the understanding of the SDG interlinkages network and its complexity. Our findings are significant for the on-going debate of policy coherence and alignment of national policies with the SDGs and the sustainability path countries should follow to progress towards an integral achievement of the 2030 Agenda.
可持续发展目标相互联系分析的复杂性度量:一种方法学方法
《2030年议程》包含17项可持续发展目标、169项具体目标和232项指标,制定了一项雄心勃勃的“为人类、地球和繁荣而行动计划”,必须在15年内(2015-2030年)实现。在联合国193个成员国实施可持续发展目标的头几年里,国际社会认识到目标、具体目标和指标之间相互作用(协同效应和权衡)网络的复杂性,因为每个国家都制定了自己的发展优先事项,而这些优先事项并不总是与2030年议程的主要目标保持一致(缺乏政策一致性;政策vs政治)。由于这种情况,考虑到可持续发展目标的普遍性和综合性,各国需要克服的主要困难之一是理解可持续发展目标之间错综复杂的相互联系网络的性质和复杂性。本研究的目的是基于产品空间理论和经济复杂性,提高对联合国各成员国在可持续发展目标实施过程中可持续性复杂性水平的理解。因此,我们通过对可持续发展目标相互联系网络及其复杂性的理解,提出了一种可持续发展目标优先事项确定工具,适用于实现《2030年议程》这一具有挑战性和雄心勃勃的任务。我们的研究结果对于正在进行的关于政策一致性和国家政策与可持续发展目标的一致性以及各国应遵循的可持续发展道路的辩论具有重要意义,以全面实现2030年议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信